Re: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:07:03 -0500

Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Dave, I am not familiar with the fundamentals, but suspect that the problem
lies in net earnings vs recurring (core operations) earnings. DGO also shows
an EPS ranking of 80, however they show the past four quarters with earnings
of 9, 25, 24, and 31 cents.

WON / CANSLIM / DGO / IBD exclude non-recurring gains and losses when that
is possible, and only considers earnings resulting from continuing
operations.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Falk, Dave K." <FALKDK@ncs.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers


> I noticed on Investors.Com today that they are showing EXPE with and EPS
> ranking of 80.
>
> Yet, in researching the actual quarterly EPS numbers, they are all
negative.
> See the following
> link for details (of course this assumes that the data is accurate):
>
> http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/hilite.asp?Symbol=EXPE
>
> Obviously, the EPS rank is based on earnings increases.  However,
shouldn't
> one be
> concerned with negative earnings?  If so, I guess just knowing a companys'
> EPS
> rating can be deceiving and require further research.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.