[CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers

From: "Falk, Dave K." <FALKDK@ncs.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:43:02 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] EPS Rating vs Actual EPS Numbers "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

I noticed on Investors.Com today that they are showing EXPE with and EPS
ranking of 80.

Yet, in researching the actual quarterly EPS numbers, they are all negative.
See the following
link for details (of course this assumes that the data is accurate):

http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/hilite.asp?Symbol=EXPE

Obviously, the EPS rank is based on earnings increases.  However, shouldn't
one be 
concerned with negative earnings?  If so, I guess just knowing a companys'
EPS 
rating can be deceiving and require further research.

Dave


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.