[CANSLIM] Re. A Possible Signal To Unscrupulous Bookeeping


From: JANSI1AUG1@aol.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re. A Possible Signal To Unscrupulous Bookeeping
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:05:58 EST

Previous Article (by Subject): RE: AW: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Canslimmers:

     I know not many (if any) high growth stocks have dividends, but this 
item from James Glassman (in techcentralstation.com) might be useful in 
identifying another Enronic-Bookeeping-Wonder (I wonder, appropos of this, 
what Enron's cash-flow was?):

"...Enron paid dividends all during the period when it now admits that it was 
overstating earnings, but those payouts were curiously flat at a time when 
the company's reported profits were soaring. For example, between 1997 and 
2000, earnings rose 69 percent but dividends rose just 9 percent. That could 
have been a sign that something fishy was happening. A company might be able 
to fake out analysts by booking today paper profits that might possibly occur 
in the future. But dividends aren't entries on the ledger; they're real 
money. A company that consistently raises its dividend is almost always a 
well-managed company in a strong market niche...." 

jans

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Previous Article (by Subject): RE: AW: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates "Fred Richards"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.