Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates


From: Ian <ianstm@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:03:44 -0800

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates Ian
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] BUY CANDIDATES "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates Ian
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- --Boundary_(ID_CtdsCkH3W1Qh69MciZim8w)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

I made great profits in my managed accounts last year, using a mixture of both long and short. However, in MY VR fund, which only allows long positions, I also made 40%+ from May 29 on (thats when I started doing it - it was also a bit of a market peak), and I was 25-35% cash the whole time. So I think that there is always money to be made in microcaps with growing revenue and EPS. IMHO, the reason that quality microcaps can resist 'M' is that they start with very low valuations relative to their bigcap peers. On the other hand, in a declining M, stocks that begin with historically bloated valuations have little chance of going a lot higher. 

In a flat/declining market, I believe that we have to give over-emphasis to the original 'S' in CANSLIM, and stick with stocks with lower shares outstanding. Remember, in WON's original studies (done in the 70's) the median # of shares outstanding was just under 5,000,000.  The big tech names of the 90's started with those kind of numbers, but they split so many times in the mania days, they have, IMHO, no chance of ever making meaningful EPS numbers ever again. 

Ian

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dan Forant 
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates


  Of course it's absurd. If anyone's been in the market for the past year and hasn't shorted and made $$, they are either very lucky or far better than the average investor. There was no shortage of stocks to short in TC2000 and candlesticks. 
   
  L8ter
  DanF
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Ian 
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com 
    Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:13 AM
    Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates


    I find it almost absurd that WON discourages shorting. Almost all of WON's ideas appear to have originated with Jesse Livermore, who made the bulk of his money on the short side. The rules for selling a big CANSLIM winner make for perfect short candidates. Although selling a failed breakout as it returns into its base is NOT typically a good short candidate. JMHO.

    Ian



    ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Rob Miller 
      To: canslim@lists.xmission.com 
      Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 6:40 AM
      Subject: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates


      Even if we have a FTD from here, I see few stocks worth buying.  However, my short list is overflowing.  The only moderately attractive stocks I see on the long side are those already in an uptrend that are riding their lower channel.
       
      Is shorting considered off limits for this list?  I know that WON discourages it, but he also claimed to make good money from shorts in HTMMIS.  As I understand it, he discourages it as a medium for the masses, nor necessarily for everyone.  
       
      Rob   

- --Boundary_(ID_CtdsCkH3W1Qh69MciZim8w)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3314.2100" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I made great profits in my managed accounts last year, using a 
mixture of both long and short. However, in MY VR fund, which only allows long 
positions, I also made 40%+ from May 29 on (thats when I started doing it - it 
was also a bit of a market peak), and I was 25-35% cash the whole time. So I 
think that there is always money to be made in microcaps with growing revenue 
and EPS. IMHO, the reason that quality microcaps can resist 'M' is that they 
start with very low valuations relative to their bigcap peers. On the other 
hand, in a declining M,&nbsp;stocks that begin with historically bloated 
valuations have little chance of going a lot higher. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>In a flat/declining market, I believe that we have to give 
over-emphasis to the original 'S' in CANSLIM, and stick with stocks with lower 
shares outstanding. Remember, in&nbsp;WON's original studies (done in the 70's) 
the median # of shares outstanding was just under 5,000,000.&nbsp; The big tech 
names of the 90's started with those kind of numbers, but they split so many 
times in the mania days, they have, IMHO, no chance of ever making meaningful 
EPS numbers ever again. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
  <A href="mailto:dforant1@nycap.rr.com" title=dforant1@nycap.rr.com>Dan 
  Forant</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
  href="mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com" 
  title=canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 15, 2002 5:03 
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy 
  Candidates</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Of course it's absurd. If anyone's been in the 
  market for the past year and hasn't shorted and made $$, they are either very 
  lucky or far better than the average investor. There was no shortage of stocks 
  to short in TC2000 and candlesticks. </FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>L8ter<BR>DanF</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
  style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV 
    style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
    <A href="mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca" title=ianstm@shaw.ca>Ian</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
    href="mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com" 
    title=canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 15, 2002 11:13 
    AM</DIV>
    <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy 
    Candidates</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>I find it almost absurd that WON discourages shorting. 
    Almost all of WON's ideas appear to have originated with Jesse Livermore, 
    who made the bulk of his money on the short side. The rules for selling a 
    big CANSLIM winner make for perfect short candidates. Although selling a 
    failed breakout as it returns into its base is NOT typically a good short 
    candidate. JMHO.</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT size=2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE 
    style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV 
      style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> 
      <A href="mailto:rmiller2@carolina.rr.com" 
      title=rmiller2@carolina.rr.com>Rob Miller</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
      href="mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com" 
      title=canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV>
      <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 15, 2002 6:40 
      AM</DIV>
      <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy 
      Candidates</DIV>
      <DIV><BR></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Even if we have a FTD from here, I see few 
      stocks worth buying.&nbsp; However, my short list is overflowing.&nbsp; 
      The only moderately attractive stocks I see on the long side are those 
      already in an uptrend that are riding their lower channel.</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial 
      size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Is&nbsp;shorting considered&nbsp;off limits 
      for this list?&nbsp; I know that WON discourages it, but he also claimed 
      to make good money from shorts in HTMMIS.&nbsp; As I understand it, 
      he&nbsp;discourages it&nbsp;as a medium for the masses, 
      nor&nbsp;necessarily for everyone.&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
      <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Rob&nbsp;&nbsp; 
  </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- --Boundary_(ID_CtdsCkH3W1Qh69MciZim8w)--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates Ian
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] BUY CANDIDATES "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Lack of Buy Candidates Ian
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.