AW: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100

From: Andreas Himmelreich <judgejimmy@web.de>
Subject: AW: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 16:46:45 +0100

Next Article (by Date): AW: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100 Andreas Himmelreich
Previous Article (by Date): AW: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100 Andreas Himmelreich
Top of Thread: AW: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100 Andreas Himmelreich
Next in Thread: AW: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100 Andreas Himmelreich
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Dito, as long there are trends (up or down) in certain areas, there will =
be=20
tons of bucks to be made. And if its not the stock market its something=20
else (comodities had a great bull during the 70s).

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:	Katherine Malm [SMTP:kmalm@earthlink.net]
> Gesendet am:	Saturday, February 23, 2002 7:21 PM
> An:	canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Betreff:	Re: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> The sideways market seems the most plausible scenario given the=20
confluence of economic/business/market/innovation cycles. What is most=20
interesting about this, however, is that although at the end of the =
period=20
the real returns on the market may be even, within that sideways market=20
there are waves of stock/industry movement to ride up and down. A=20
discipline like CANSLIM will allow us to make money during this type of=20
market but doesn't allow for the sloppiness in candidate mining/due=20
diligence/entry/exit afforded us by a Great Bull run. I just think a sid =
=20
eways market will *force* us to be excellent investors and I can't see =
that=20
that's a bad thing.
>
> Katherine
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Patrick Wahl
>   To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
>   Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 11:19 AM
>   Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Market, Nasdaq 100
>
>
>   I've seen several people make the same forecast for a 10-15 year=20
sideway market, I
>   guess this would be similar to the market from the late 60's to =
1982,=20
so it is certainly
>   possible.  Not very encouraging, I hope you are wrong on this one.  =
We=20
were above
>   the long term growth trend of the market for so long that I suppose =
a=20
below trend
>   period is due.
>
>   (remember the books of a few years ago - Dow 30,000, and I think =
there=20
was also a
>   Dow 50,000.  Wonder where the authors stand on this now.)
>
>   On 22 Feb 2002 at 17:11, Katherine Malm wrote:
>
>   > I remember your remark, Fred, and I heed well the advise. I do,
>   > however, differentiate between "hope" and "what I see" as they are =

not
>   > one and the same. I have never believed that we were headed into a
>   > raging Bull as the '82-'00 but instead into a long 10-15 year=20
sideways
>   > market. We have several forces working in =
tandem--monetary/inflation
>   > cycles, earnings cycles, global interconnectedness, innovation=20
cycles,
>   > human nature, fiscal policy, market cycles, etc. Despite the fact=20
that
>   > I was not investing during the last 100 years, I have studied =
market
>   > history. For that reason, I simply "read what is and act upon it" =
vs.
>   > "wish or hope that the market will go up." A CANSLIM discipline =
works
>   > because it forces the trader/investor to read the signals and act
>   > accordingly.
>
>
>   -
>   -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
>   -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
>   -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>  << Datei: ATT00000.htm >> 

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.