Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

From: "Dan Forant" <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:51:12 -0500

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Norman"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Norman"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

But........maybe some of the rest of us can learn from it and tailor it to
our needs. It has been suggested, but tried??

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500


> Duke,
>
> While in theory a fine idea, has been suggested before in this group
without
> success. Primary reason is that we are all unique and individual
investors,
> and don't conform well to a single shopping list. I am certainly an
extreme
> example, posting a list in my weekly WWW, and rarely interested in any of
> them because I am only interested in small and micro cap stocks.
>
> Only another small cap investor would be interested in my favorites, and I
> don't share even with them as a rule.
>
> One of the strengths, even beauties, of CANSLIM is the ability to tailor
it
> to the individual's personal preferences and criteria. Takes experience
and
> time to learn to do this well, but for those that have accomplished this,
> they typically have little interest in someone else's list, as it does not
> match their criteria exactly.
>
> Tom Worley
> stkguru@netside.net
> AIM: TexWorley
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
> To: "Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:12 PM
> Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
>
>
> > Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few observations and proffer
a
> > what-if.
> >
> > a)  Working through this market, tugging constantly with my buy
checklist,
> > it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) successful (or
> > committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY unbiased!
> >
> > b)  The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this and/or
CANSLIM-that
> is
> > unending (as it should be).  The arguments haven't changed since the
> concept
> > was developed.  NO matter how hard we try to stay between the lines, we
> each
> > have our own variation(s), don't we?
> >
> > c)  It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever confident the
> > market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's ready to. I agree
> with
> > Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these days.  I've
got
> > two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been "whipsawed" out
> of.
> > (One thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my blunders, rather study
> and
> > learn from them.  I still hate doing that!)
> >
> > I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock in four that
> > doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in is not fun.
So
> > here's a  what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna Maria Island:
> Is
> > it conceivable we might better devote our time to channeling our
> collective
> > energies toward building "all-star" watch list?  One that, when the M
does
> > turn, we can be ready in the wings?
> >
> > Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or original to
this
> > group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each "nominate" one,
> > two, or three personal-favorite watch stocks.  Ones you'd buy for your
own
> > mother! (The "mother" of all lists???)   And we take that list, follow
its
> > contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the merits of each
> > "nomination," old or new.
> >
> > Just today we got lists from Tim and John;  I wonder which three from
each
> > list they'd nominate for the Mother List?
> >
> > IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own lists; b) steepen
> our
> > CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of us when the
> > tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun (while we wait
> for
> > M)!
> >
> > If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a nomination
checklist
> > which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc.  So what do you
> think?
> >
> > A final note:  I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be monitoring as
> > best I can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best.  Worst case
> > scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's end.
> >
> > Duke
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.