Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500


From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:23:30 -0500

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Smal and Micro Caps "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Smal and Micro Caps "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Dan Forant"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Duke,

While in theory a fine idea, has been suggested before in this group without
success. Primary reason is that we are all unique and individual investors,
and don't conform well to a single shopping list. I am certainly an extreme
example, posting a list in my weekly WWW, and rarely interested in any of
them because I am only interested in small and micro cap stocks.

Only another small cap investor would be interested in my favorites, and I
don't share even with them as a rule.

One of the strengths, even beauties, of CANSLIM is the ability to tailor it
to the individual's personal preferences and criteria. Takes experience and
time to learn to do this well, but for those that have accomplished this,
they typically have little interest in someone else's list, as it does not
match their criteria exactly.

Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
To: "Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:12 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500


> Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few observations and proffer a
> what-if.
>
> a)  Working through this market, tugging constantly with my buy checklist,
> it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) successful (or
> committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY unbiased!
>
> b)  The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this and/or CANSLIM-that
is
> unending (as it should be).  The arguments haven't changed since the
concept
> was developed.  NO matter how hard we try to stay between the lines, we
each
> have our own variation(s), don't we?
>
> c)  It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever confident the
> market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's ready to. I agree
with
> Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these days.  I've got
> two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been "whipsawed" out
of.
> (One thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my blunders, rather study
and
> learn from them.  I still hate doing that!)
>
> I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock in four that
> doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in is not fun.  So
> here's a  what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna Maria Island:
Is
> it conceivable we might better devote our time to channeling our
collective
> energies toward building "all-star" watch list?  One that, when the M does
> turn, we can be ready in the wings?
>
> Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or original to this
> group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each "nominate" one,
> two, or three personal-favorite watch stocks.  Ones you'd buy for your own
> mother! (The "mother" of all lists???)   And we take that list, follow its
> contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the merits of each
> "nomination," old or new.
>
> Just today we got lists from Tim and John;  I wonder which three from each
> list they'd nominate for the Mother List?
>
> IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own lists; b) steepen
our
> CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of us when the
> tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun (while we wait
for
> M)!
>
> If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a nomination checklist
> which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc.  So what do you
think?
>
> A final note:  I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be monitoring as
> best I can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best.  Worst case
> scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's end.
>
> Duke
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Smal and Micro Caps "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Smal and Micro Caps "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Dan Forant"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.