RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500


From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 18:24:32 -0500

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Smal and Micro Caps "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Duke Miller"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


I haven't left town yet, and wish to respond to the early replies.

Because it hasn't been tried or has been tried and not work...phooey! As for
your varying styles and areas of concentration...so what?  The more and the
more varied the merrier.  I don't care what color your preferences are, as
long as the go up when they're supposed to and make money, they're all GREEN
to me!

I'll put my effort where my what-if is (Got nothing else to do while waiting
for M, do we?):  I will administer this to get it up and running.  My vision
is everyone submits their favorites; you all suggest a number of
submissions, I'll average them and pass it on; if we want five and you have
only two, send them anyway;  then I'll compile them on a spreadsheet of some
sort with the appropriate criteria (that we agree on).

So, have at it with your opinions.  I'll be watching from my remote Hotmail
account while away.  Then you'll be hearing from me.  Oh yes, and have FUN!

Duke

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:59 PM
> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
>
>
> I think the best test would be if you could get every one of the 450 or so
> members to contribute their top five stocks (excluding ones they
> simply got
> here). Then rank order the list by frequency of mention. Then get a few
> dedicated people to do full, in depth, due diligence and post the results
> for discussion.
>
> If only 10 or 20 people participate, the results can be heavily skewed by
> one individual's bias or preference.
>
> Tom Worley
> stkguru@netside.net
> AIM: TexWorley
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Forant" <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
>
>
> > But........maybe some of the rest of us can learn from it and
> tailor it to
> > our needs. It has been suggested, but tried??
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
> >
> >
> > > Duke,
> > >
> > > While in theory a fine idea, has been suggested before in this group
> > without
> > > success. Primary reason is that we are all unique and individual
> > investors,
> > > and don't conform well to a single shopping list. I am certainly an
> > extreme
> > > example, posting a list in my weekly WWW, and rarely interested in any
> of
> > > them because I am only interested in small and micro cap stocks.
> > >
> > > Only another small cap investor would be interested in my
> favorites, and
> I
> > > don't share even with them as a rule.
> > >
> > > One of the strengths, even beauties, of CANSLIM is the
> ability to tailor
> > it
> > > to the individual's personal preferences and criteria. Takes
> experience
> > and
> > > time to learn to do this well, but for those that have accomplished
> this,
> > > they typically have little interest in someone else's list, as it does
> not
> > > match their criteria exactly.
> > >
> > > Tom Worley
> > > stkguru@netside.net
> > > AIM: TexWorley
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
> > > To: "Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:12 PM
> > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > > > Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few observations and
> proffer
> > a
> > > > what-if.
> > > >
> > > > a)  Working through this market, tugging constantly with my buy
> > checklist,
> > > > it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) successful (or
> > > > committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY unbiased!
> > > >
> > > > b)  The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this and/or
> > CANSLIM-that
> > > is
> > > > unending (as it should be).  The arguments haven't changed since the
> > > concept
> > > > was developed.  NO matter how hard we try to stay between the lines,
> we
> > > each
> > > > have our own variation(s), don't we?
> > > >
> > > > c)  It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever confident the
> > > > market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's ready to. I
> agree
> > > with
> > > > Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these
> days.  I've
> > got
> > > > two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been "whipsawed"
> out
> > > of.
> > > > (One thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my blunders, rather
> study
> > > and
> > > > learn from them.  I still hate doing that!)
> > > >
> > > > I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock
> in four that
> > > > doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in
> is not fun.
> > So
> > > > here's a  what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna Maria
> Island:
> > > Is
> > > > it conceivable we might better devote our time to channeling our
> > > collective
> > > > energies toward building "all-star" watch list?  One that,
> when the M
> > does
> > > > turn, we can be ready in the wings?
> > > >
> > > > Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or
> original to
> > this
> > > > group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each "nominate"
> one,
> > > > two, or three personal-favorite watch stocks.  Ones you'd
> buy for your
> > own
> > > > mother! (The "mother" of all lists???)   And we take that
> list, follow
> > its
> > > > contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the
> merits of each
> > > > "nomination," old or new.
> > > >
> > > > Just today we got lists from Tim and John;  I wonder which
> three from
> > each
> > > > list they'd nominate for the Mother List?
> > > >
> > > > IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own lists; b)
> steepen
> > > our
> > > > CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of
> us when the
> > > > tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun (while we
> wait
> > > for
> > > > M)!
> > > >
> > > > If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a nomination
> > checklist
> > > > which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc.  So
> what do you
> > > think?
> > > >
> > > > A final note:  I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be
> monitoring
> as
> > > > best I can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best.  Worst case
> > > > scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's end.
> > > >
> > > > Duke
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Smal and Micro Caps "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Duke Miller"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.