Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500

From: "Dan Forant" <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:50:45 -0500
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Dan Forant"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Dan Forant"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
Hey Duke, I like the name pardner, good luck getting this off the ground.
Many good ideas never get past the discussion stage. Democracy as we know
it, without a President would never be. Let us know when your ready,
hopefully before I grow a long beard.

DanF

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500


> I haven't left town yet, and wish to respond to the early replies.
>
> Because it hasn't been tried or has been tried and not work...phooey! As
for
> your varying styles and areas of concentration...so what?  The more and
the
> more varied the merrier.  I don't care what color your preferences are, as
> long as the go up when they're supposed to and make money, they're all
GREEN
> to me!
>
> I'll put my effort where my what-if is (Got nothing else to do while
waiting
> for M, do we?):  I will administer this to get it up and running.  My
vision
> is everyone submits their favorites; you all suggest a number of
> submissions, I'll average them and pass it on; if we want five and you
have
> only two, send them anyway;  then I'll compile them on a spreadsheet of
some
> sort with the appropriate criteria (that we agree on).
>
> So, have at it with your opinions.  I'll be watching from my remote
Hotmail
> account while away.  Then you'll be hearing from me.  Oh yes, and have
FUN!
>
> Duke
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:59 PM
> > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
> >
> >
> > I think the best test would be if you could get every one of the 450 or
so
> > members to contribute their top five stocks (excluding ones they
> > simply got
> > here). Then rank order the list by frequency of mention. Then get a few
> > dedicated people to do full, in depth, due diligence and post the
results
> > for discussion.
> >
> > If only 10 or 20 people participate, the results can be heavily skewed
by
> > one individual's bias or preference.
> >
> > Tom Worley
> > stkguru@netside.net
> > AIM: TexWorley
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Forant" <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
> >
> >
> > > But........maybe some of the rest of us can learn from it and
> > tailor it to
> > > our needs. It has been suggested, but tried??
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:23 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > > > Duke,
> > > >
> > > > While in theory a fine idea, has been suggested before in this group
> > > without
> > > > success. Primary reason is that we are all unique and individual
> > > investors,
> > > > and don't conform well to a single shopping list. I am certainly an
> > > extreme
> > > > example, posting a list in my weekly WWW, and rarely interested in
any
> > of
> > > > them because I am only interested in small and micro cap stocks.
> > > >
> > > > Only another small cap investor would be interested in my
> > favorites, and
> > I
> > > > don't share even with them as a rule.
> > > >
> > > > One of the strengths, even beauties, of CANSLIM is the
> > ability to tailor
> > > it
> > > > to the individual's personal preferences and criteria. Takes
> > experience
> > > and
> > > > time to learn to do this well, but for those that have accomplished
> > this,
> > > > they typically have little interest in someone else's list, as it
does
> > not
> > > > match their criteria exactly.
> > > >
> > > > Tom Worley
> > > > stkguru@netside.net
> > > > AIM: TexWorley
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
> > > > To: "Canslim@Lists. Xmission. Com" <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:12 PM
> > > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Being new to this list, I'd like to share a few observations and
> > proffer
> > > a
> > > > > what-if.
> > > > >
> > > > > a)  Working through this market, tugging constantly with my buy
> > > checklist,
> > > > > it helps to have company that's a) knowledgeable, b) successful
(or
> > > > > committed to striving for it), and c) CERTAINLY unbiased!
> > > > >
> > > > > b)  The debate herein over the merits of CANSLIM-this and/or
> > > CANSLIM-that
> > > > is
> > > > > unending (as it should be).  The arguments haven't changed since
the
> > > > concept
> > > > > was developed.  NO matter how hard we try to stay between the
lines,
> > we
> > > > each
> > > > > have our own variation(s), don't we?
> > > > >
> > > > > c)  It seems we're all watch-listing and waiting, ever confident
the
> > > > > market's going to eventually break out ONLY when it's ready to. I
> > agree
> > > > with
> > > > > Katherine, that we can certainly "mine" some winners these
> > days.  I've
> > > got
> > > > > two that are showing promise, buy a dozen more I've been
"whipsawed"
> > out
> > > > of.
> > > > > (One thing WON taught me is not to "hide" from my blunders, rather
> > study
> > > > and
> > > > > learn from them.  I still hate doing that!)
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you'll all agree, trying to unearth the one stock
> > in four that
> > > > > doesn't shake us out unmercifully in this market we're in
> > is not fun.
> > > So
> > > > > here's a  what if from the glistening Gulf shores of Anna Maria
> > Island:
> > > > Is
> > > > > it conceivable we might better devote our time to channeling our
> > > > collective
> > > > > energies toward building "all-star" watch list?  One that,
> > when the M
> > > does
> > > > > turn, we can be ready in the wings?
> > > > >
> > > > > Forgive me if the thought isn't totally developed yet (or
> > original to
> > > this
> > > > > group), but what if...those interested "sign up" to each
"nominate"
> > one,
> > > > > two, or three personal-favorite watch stocks.  Ones you'd
> > buy for your
> > > own
> > > > > mother! (The "mother" of all lists???)   And we take that
> > list, follow
> > > its
> > > > > contents' progress together and, on-going, "debate" the
> > merits of each
> > > > > "nomination," old or new.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just today we got lists from Tim and John;  I wonder which
> > three from
> > > each
> > > > > list they'd nominate for the Mother List?
> > > > >
> > > > > IMHO, this: a) would help us expand and refine our own lists; b)
> > steepen
> > > > our
> > > > > CANSLIM learning curves via the debates; c) benefit all of
> > us when the
> > > > > tide(s) turn; and c), would be a source for a little fun (while we
> > wait
> > > > for
> > > > > M)!
> > > > >
> > > > > If there's enough interest, I'll be glad to suggest a nomination
> > > checklist
> > > > > which we can improvise as we go along, etc, etc, etc.  So
> > what do you
> > > > think?
> > > > >
> > > > > A final note:  I'm out of town until Thursday, but will be
> > monitoring
> > as
> > > > > best I can from my remote hotmail account, iffy at best.  Worst
case
> > > > > scenario, I'll compile a wrap-up of your input by week's end.
> > > > >
> > > > > Duke
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.