RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500


From: "Logan, Scott L." <slogan@gosafeguard.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:05:20 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Ann"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Ann"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Patrick,
 I agree. Information good or bad is just information.
This is not a subscription based service listing hot stocks.

We can however assist each other by sharing our strengths and weaknesses.
Any mention of stocks here should be followed up by our own research.
Two ( or more ) heads are better than one.

Thank you,
Scott

- -----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Wahl [mailto:pjwahl@attbi.com]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:55 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500


Two thoughts - first, touting is a harsh word, presenting a list is not the
same as 
touting, that is what goes on on some of these bulletin boards (so I've
heard).  

Second, no one should ever buy a stock because it is mentioned here.  If you

blindly buy a stock for the sole reason that it is mentioned here you
probably 
deserve to lose money.  I've mentioned stocks here before, and they all come
with a 
caveat emptor disclaimer.  I think any stock mentioned should be considered
as a 
starting point for anyone to do their own research and make their own
decision as to 
whether or not it is suitable for purchase.  Anyone who doesn't feel capable
of doing 
that should be putting their money in a mutual fund, or doing more reading
and 
research to get up to speed.

I think most people who read this list are probably here because they are do
it 
yourself types and capable of making their own determinations about when to
buy a 
stock.  A little help in filtering down the 10,000 or whatever it is stocks
that are out 
there is welcome to me anyway.  But no one should feel pressured to share
stocks, 
that is certainly an individual decision.  

On 25 Feb 2002 at 12:51, Spencer48@aol.com wrote:

> John:
> 
>      I have not looked further down the E-mails, so I don't know what 
> Katherine's response will be.  But here is mine:   This is a list devoted
to 
> sharing investing knowledge, not devoted to touting stocks, or invading
the 
> privacy of anyone who works hard garnering his/her own list. 
> 
>      Practically, here is another objection:  What if the stock falls
instead 
> of rises; or what if the stock rises and then falls.  The person who
bought 
> the stock based on the suggested list will lose money, because no one can 
> tell you for certain WHEN the stock should be sold (eg. when it's a poor 
> stock, or when it's a good stock whose BO failed-or succeeded briefly) :  
> That can be seen only after the buy through  technical chart analysis.  


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Ann"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 "Ann"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.