Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:58:50 -0600
Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] what is to much ownership?? "Rich W"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Warren Keuffel
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Warren Keuffel
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C1BECD.B806A1A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Warren I'll second that point of view. I think it's instructive for individuals = to post a message such as "what do you think about this stock" so = members of the list can review and comment. If nothing else, it's great = practice at evaluating fundamentals and technicals, even if it is not a = stock that you yourself would consider. So that it doesn't seem as = though I'm reversing course here, I'll also second Tom's earlier comment = that it is impossible to comment on or learn from a lengthy *list* of = stocks (though I am not suggesting that those who post discontinue doing = so--certainly a personal choice). Finally, in order to clarify my = earlier point of view, I don't think that attempting to compile a = collective list of "the" stocks is helpful, as each individual has a = particular style.=20 Duke, if you are reading this, I'd like to suggest an alternative to = your compiled list and instead suggest people do as Warren suggests here = and simply post, once a week or so, a stock for review. The tag line = would simply be "would you buy this and why?" or "would you sell this = and why?" The stocks we throw out could be *anything* for any reason and = not necessarily something we own or that we are looking to buy. For = example, it might be a stock we do not own but that we feel is showing = signs of distress. It might be a stock that is setting up for breakout, = but for reasons of our own, we may or may not have left it on our list. = It might be a stock with "a good story." Etc.=20 Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Warren Keuffel=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 My $0.02 -- and Ann, I'm not replying to you specifically -- just = using=20 your message as a place to hang my comment -- what *I* find most=20 valuable is when someone suggests a stock or three and others point = out=20 problems with the pattern or the fundies -- doing this helps me=20 fine-tune what I should be looking at when evaluating *any* stocks. = For=20 example, there was a stock mentioned not too long ago (forget which = one=20 it was) and I was considering whether to ignore the less than perfect=20 pattern when someone else pointed out that it was a kissing cousin of = a=20 MLM. As soon as I heard that I the stock was in the circular file, as = I=20 have a very low personal opinion of any MLM (living in Utah I see far=20 too many MLM scams.) Again, my $0.02 -- so to those who want to post picks and those who = want=20 to comment -- THANKS! Warren Ann wrote: > I'll attest to to that--You have helped me immensely, Katherine. > > =20 > > As one who hasn't had time to contribute to the list in awhile, let=20 > alone mine for stocks, I would be very disappointed if the list = turned=20 > into a stock-picking club. I wouldn't be able to continue to learn=20 > quietly on the sidelines by reading all these discussions, and would = > have to drop out because of my other time commitments and inability = to=20 > contribute my fair share. > > =20 > > Thanks again, Katherine, > > =20 > > Ann > > =20 > > =20 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Katherine Malm <mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net> > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com = <mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54 AM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 > > > But the truth is, I'll go out of my way to help absolutely > anybody, share what I know so that others can become better > investors, > - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C1BECD.B806A1A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>Warren</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'll second that point of view. I think it's instructive for = individuals to=20 post a message such as "what do you think about this stock" so members = of the=20 list can review and comment. If nothing else, it's great practice at = evaluating=20 fundamentals and technicals, even if it is not a stock that you yourself = would=20 consider. So that it doesn't seem as though I'm reversing course here, = I'll also=20 second Tom's earlier comment that it is impossible to comment on or = learn=20 from a lengthy *list* of stocks (though I am not suggesting that = those who=20 post discontinue doing so--certainly a personal choice). Finally, in = order to=20 clarify my earlier point of view, I don't think that attempting to=20 compile a collective list of "the" stocks is helpful, as each = individual=20 has a particular style. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Duke, if you are reading this, I'd like to suggest an alternative = to your=20 compiled list and instead suggest people do as Warren suggests here and = simply=20 post, once a week or so, a stock for review. The tag line would simply = be "would=20 you buy this and why?" or "would you sell this and why?" The stocks we = throw out=20 could be *anything* for any reason and not necessarily something we own = or that=20 we are looking to buy. For example, it might be a stock we do not own = but that=20 we feel is showing signs of distress. It might be a stock that is = setting up for=20 breakout, but for reasons of our own, we may or may not have left it on = our=20 list. It might be a stock with "a good story." Etc. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Katherine</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dwkeuffel@xmission.com = href=3D"mailto:wkeuffel@xmission.com">Warren=20 Keuffel</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 26, = 2002 1:36=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Date: = Sun, 24 Feb=20 2002 15:11:27 -0500</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>My $0.02 -- and Ann, I'm not replying to you = specifically --=20 just using <BR>your message as a place to hang my comment -- what *I* = find=20 most <BR>valuable is when someone suggests a stock or three and others = point=20 out <BR>problems with the pattern or the fundies -- doing this helps = me=20 <BR>fine-tune what I should be looking at when evaluating *any* = stocks. =20 For <BR>example, there was a stock mentioned not too long ago (forget = which=20 one <BR>it was) and I was considering whether to ignore the less than = perfect=20 <BR>pattern when someone else pointed out that it was a kissing cousin = of a=20 <BR>MLM. As soon as I heard that I the stock was in the circular = file,=20 as I <BR>have a very low personal opinion of any MLM (living in Utah I = see far=20 <BR>too many MLM scams.)<BR><BR>Again, my $0.02 -- so to those who = want to=20 post picks and those who want <BR>to comment --=20 THANKS!<BR><BR>Warren<BR><BR>Ann wrote:<BR><BR>> I'll attest to to=20 that--You have helped me immensely, Katherine.<BR>><BR>> =20 <BR>><BR>> As one who hasn't had time to contribute to the list = in=20 awhile, let <BR>> alone mine for stocks, I would be very = disappointed if=20 the list turned <BR>> into a stock-picking club. I wouldn't be able = to=20 continue to learn <BR>> quietly on the sidelines by reading all = these=20 discussions, and would <BR>> have to drop out because of my other = time=20 commitments and inability to <BR>> contribute my fair=20 share.<BR>><BR>> <BR>><BR>> Thanks again,=20 Katherine,<BR>><BR>> <BR>><BR>> = Ann<BR>><BR>> =20 <BR>><BR>> <BR>><BR>> ----- = Original=20 Message -----<BR>><BR>> From: Katherine = Malm=20 <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net</A>><BR= >><BR>> =20 To: <A = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= =20 <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.= com</A>><BR>><BR>> =20 Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:54=20 AM<BR>><BR>> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] = Date: Sun,=20 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 = - -0500<BR>><BR>><BR>> But=20 the truth is, I'll go out of my way to help=20 absolutely<BR>> anybody, share what I know = so that=20 others can become better<BR>> =20 investors,<BR>><BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe = canslim". Do=20 not use quotes in your email.</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C1BECD.B806A1A0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] what is to much ownership?? "Rich W"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Warren Keuffel
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:11:27 -0500 Warren Keuffel
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]