From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool!
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 16:52:58 -0600
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Duke Miller"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Tim Fisher"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Tim Fisher"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Duke Miller"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C1C39D.09A87000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tim, I don't recall any fake-out FTD's since early 2000, I only recall FTD's = followed by fairly short-lived rallies. Still long positions and good = stocks making breakouts in all of the rallies. Sell rules take us out = when the time comes in the same way buy rules get us in. It's just not = going to be a Big Bull like we saw in the last half of the 90's. Just = have to be nimble and follow all the signals in/out as required. Katherine ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tim Fisher=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 4:42 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! No, I base my requirements on the fake-out F/T days that did not meet = them=20 since March 2000. Today convinces me that the "everybody in the pool"=20 signal has been given. At 02:03 PM 3/4/2002 -0600, you wrote: >Hi Tim, > >Have you backtested your parameters through several market cycles to = see=20 >if they give more reliable signals than WON's? > >Think the acid test is whether good quality stocks are breaking out = of=20 >bases. Certainly plenty of new highs and some additional base = breakouts=20 >today to confirm a trend that's been ongoing along with the indexes=20 >posting their WON follow-thru days. > >Katherine >----- Original Message ----- >From: <mailto:Tim@orerockon.com>Tim Fisher >To: <mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:55 PM >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NAZ volume extremely high today ... > >For me, "Official" means two or more indices up 1.5% to 2% on greater = vol >than the day before and greater than 30d avg vol within 5-15 trading = days >from the recent low. Your results may differ. > >At 12:32 PM 3/4/2002 -0700, you wrote: > >Coincidently, I'm reading "the 24 lessons" which > >on pg. 76 states: > >"follow through" ..., indicated by one of the > >indices (DOW, S&P 500, or > >Nasdaq Compisite) closing up 1% or more for the > >day, with a jump in volume > >from the day before. > > > >Not sure if this is what you mean by 'official'. > > > > Rolf > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Tim Fisher" <<mailto:Tim@orerockon.com>Tim@orerockon.com> > >To: <<mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com> > >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM > >Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NAZ volume extremely high > >today ... > > > > > > > My question, to which I received no replies, > >still remains: the DOW and > > > NYSE comp did not F/T within their respective > >windows, and did not undercut > > > their earlier lows since (unlike the NASDAQ > >comp). So from an official F/T > > > day watch point of view, do we get a valid F/T > >day on more than just the > > > NASDAQ even if the other indices follow through > >on volume today? > > > > > > At 08:17 AM 3/4/2002 -0800, you wrote: > > > >I guess this will be the official 6th day > >follow-through on te NAZ. Very > > > >heavy volume for this time of day. > > > > > > > >Now all that remains is to find some quality > >companies moving up - I am > > > >seeing a definite shift away from microcaps > >(except BEL, which moves up > > > >vertically every single day) and into big caps. > >My problem is that I am > > > >having trouble finding any growing big caps > >whose businesses aren't > > > >performing poorly. My only slighly larger > >company purchase last week was > > > >ELON - i like the 150% growth in this market. > >Any great ideas out there? > > > > > > > >Ian > > > > > > Tim Fisher > > > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site > > > Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. > > > <mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com>mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com > > > WWW <http://OreRockOn.com>http://OreRockOn.com > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email > >"<mailto:majordomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in > >your email. > > > > > > > > >- > >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20 > "<mailto:majordomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com" > >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > >Tim Fisher >Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site >Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. ><mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com>mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com >WWW <http://OreRockOn.com>http://OreRockOn.com > > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email=20 >"<mailto:majordomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C1C39D.09A87000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>Tim,</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I don't recall any fake-out FTD's since early 2000, I only recall = FTD's=20 followed by fairly short-lived rallies. Still long positions and good = stocks=20 making breakouts in all of the rallies. Sell rules take us out when the = time=20 comes in the same way buy rules get us in. It's just not going to be a = Big Bull=20 like we saw in the last half of the 90's. Just have to be nimble and = follow all=20 the signals in/out as required.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Katherine</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3DTim@orerockon.com href=3D"mailto:Tim@orerockon.com">Tim = Fisher</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, March 04, 2002 = 4:42=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Everybody in = the=20 pool!</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>No, I base my requirements on the fake-out F/T days = that did=20 not meet them <BR>since March 2000. Today convinces me that the = "everybody in=20 the pool" <BR>signal has been given.<BR><BR>At 02:03 PM 3/4/2002 = - -0600, you=20 wrote:<BR>>Hi Tim,<BR>><BR>>Have you backtested your = parameters=20 through several market cycles to see <BR>>if they give more = reliable=20 signals than WON's?<BR>><BR>>Think the acid test is whether good = quality=20 stocks are breaking out of <BR>>bases. Certainly plenty of new = highs and=20 some additional base breakouts <BR>>today to confirm a trend that's = been=20 ongoing along with the indexes <BR>>posting their WON follow-thru=20 days.<BR>><BR>>Katherine<BR>>----- Original Message=20 -----<BR>>From: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:Tim@orerockon.com>Tim">mailto:Tim@orerockon.com>Tim</A>= =20 Fisher<BR>>To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com">mai= lto:canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A><BR>>S= ent:=20 Monday, March 04, 2002 1:55 PM<BR>>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NAZ = volume=20 extremely high today ...<BR>><BR>>For me, "Official" means two = or more=20 indices up 1.5% to 2% on greater vol<BR>>than the day before and = greater=20 than 30d avg vol within 5-15 trading days<BR>>from the recent low. = Your=20 results may differ.<BR>><BR>>At 12:32 PM 3/4/2002 -0700, you=20 wrote:<BR>> >Coincidently, I'm reading "the 24 lessons" = which<BR>>=20 >on pg. 76 states:<BR>> >"follow through" ..., indicated by = one of=20 the<BR>> >indices (DOW, S&P 500, or<BR>> >Nasdaq = Compisite)=20 closing up 1% or more for the<BR>> >day, with a jump in = volume<BR>>=20 >from the day before.<BR>> ><BR>> >Not sure if this is = what you=20 mean by 'official'.<BR>> ><BR>> > Rolf<BR>> = ><BR>>=20 >----- Original Message -----<BR>> >From: "Tim Fisher" = <<<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:Tim@orerockon.com>Tim@orerockon.com">mailto:Tim@orerockon.= com>Tim@orerockon.com</A>><BR>>=20 >To: <<<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com">mai= lto:canslim@lists.xmission.com>canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>><BR>&= gt;=20 >Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM<BR>> >Subject: Re: = [CANSLIM]=20 NAZ volume extremely high<BR>> >today ...<BR>> ><BR>>=20 ><BR>> > > My question, to which I received no = replies,<BR>>=20 >still remains: the DOW and<BR>> > > NYSE comp did not F/T = within=20 their respective<BR>> >windows, and did not undercut<BR>> = > >=20 their earlier lows since (unlike the NASDAQ<BR>> >comp). So from = an=20 official F/T<BR>> > > day watch point of view, do we get a = valid=20 F/T<BR>> >day on more than just the<BR>> > > NASDAQ = even if the=20 other indices follow through<BR>> >on volume today?<BR>> > = ><BR>> > > At 08:17 AM 3/4/2002 -0800, you wrote:<BR>> = >=20 > >I guess this will be the official 6th day<BR>> = >follow-through=20 on te NAZ. Very<BR>> > > >heavy volume for this time of=20 day.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > >Now all that remains = is to=20 find some quality<BR>> >companies moving up - I am<BR>> > = >=20 >seeing a definite shift away from microcaps<BR>> >(except = BEL, which=20 moves up<BR>> > > >vertically every single day) and into = big=20 caps.<BR>> >My problem is that I am<BR>> > > >having = trouble=20 finding any growing big caps<BR>> >whose businesses = aren't<BR>> >=20 > >performing poorly. My only slighly larger<BR>> >company = purchase last week was<BR>> > > >ELON - i like the 150% = growth in=20 this market.<BR>> >Any great ideas out there?<BR>> > >=20 ><BR>> > > >Ian<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Tim = Fisher<BR>> > > Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site<BR>> = > >=20 Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd.<BR>> > > <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com>mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com">mailto:tim@Ore= RockOn.com>mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com</A><BR>>=20 > > WWW <<A=20 = href=3D"http://OreRockOn.com>http://OreRockOn.com">http://OreRockOn.com&g= t;http://OreRockOn.com</A><BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email<BR>> >"<<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com">mailto:majo= rdomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = > >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in<BR>> >your=20 email.<BR>> > ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> = >-<BR>>=20 >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email <BR>> "<<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com">mailto:majo= rdomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>=20 >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = >-"unsubscribe=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>><BR>>Tim=20 Fisher<BR>>Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site<BR>>Owner, Fisher=20 Fisheries, Ltd.<BR>><<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com>mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com">mailto:tim@Ore= RockOn.com>mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com</A><BR>>WWW=20 <<A=20 = href=3D"http://OreRockOn.com>http://OreRockOn.com">http://OreRockOn.com&g= t;http://OreRockOn.com</A><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>-<BR>>-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email <BR>>"<<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com">mailto:majo= rdomo@xmission.com>majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>-In=20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>>-"unsubscribe=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR><BR>Tim=20 Fisher<BR>Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site<BR>Owner, Fisher = Fisheries,=20 Ltd.<BR><A = href=3D"mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com">mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com</A><BR>WWW=20 <A = href=3D"http://OreRockOn.com">http://OreRockOn.com</A><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-T= o=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe = canslim". Do=20 not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C1C39D.09A87000-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Duke Miller"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Tim Fisher"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Tim Fisher"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Everybody in the pool! "Duke Miller"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]