From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] A short ride
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:42:40 -0500
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Mike: If I may, some observations (albeit laced with a touch of cynicism, which I hope is acceptable herein...in moderation, of course...). My recollection is, Mike, is to expect just that scenario you've described below, but ONLY when it CLOSES at the BOTTOM of the fall on high volume. Which poses a question: If it's noon, the stock is trading in the bottom of it's range on high volume, should you sell? (Those of you who use stops don't need to answer that...you're out already!) But what if it rebounds an hour later, and subsequently closes down somewhat, but higher than where it was at noon? Did I screw up selling too soon? The answer: See tomorrow's chart, then decide! Then you'd find that what it did (pullback slightly after breakout) was normal! "Remember when's" are more the rule than the exception these days. A few recent examples: How many remember this one (from my notes at a seminar ten years ago): "Only buy a stock after it CLOSES above its breakout on 150% or greater volume. Then buy it at the next day's opening price." Hmm. I know the volatile 90's necessitated a change, but the shakeouts I've encountered since January1 have caused me to reflect on this old rule. Then, just the other day, in Investor's Corner, "Only buy a stock within 5% of its pivot point, unless it gaps up at the open." So if it gaps up at the open is it okay to buy it if it's up 10% mid-day? I think I know the answer: Only if TOMORROW's says you should have. Then comes this a.m.'s Big Picture: "Defense contractors, home builders and some retailers that defied the market's recent correction are too extended above their prior bases to buy without risking a shakeout." I distinctly remember a recent comment therein that these are the stocks to consider, because they're done so well in a down market! You know, high Relative Strength? Finally, and hopefully this is only bordering on blasphemy: Today's Investors Corner says: "IBD founder William O'Neil says he's right only about half the time. The secret to his success? At an IBD advanced seminar last year, O'Neil said he's kept his losses at an average of about 4%. But when he finds a winner...." Excuse me, isn't 4% about half the 8% "insurance" he recommends? Could this be a misprint? I know this only proves we're all constantly developing our own variances on a theme. It's like I told my wife this morning: "You know, I think I'm going to get this whole process nailed down to perfection the day before I leave this world!" Ain't hindsight a wonderful thing? Now where did I put tomorrow's charts??? Happy hunting... Duke > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Mike Lucero > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:51 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride > > > I seem to remember an article where they said don't worry if a stock falls > hard back toward it's pivot, even on increasing volume. Hmm. > > Mike > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:47 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride > > > Oops sorry Mike. I meant to get back to you. Thankfully Katherine > stepped up > to the plate with the article. > Btw, today's action confirms the failed breakout. Looked like a > great stock > at the time though... > > -Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:26 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride > > > Hi Mike, > > I've uploaded a copy of the article to: > > http://WallStreet-LLC.com/pub/BreakoutReversals030602.jpg > > Katherine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike Lucero > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:09 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride > > > What did it say? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:27 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride > > > UOPX sure looks like another example of today's Investors > Corner - Beware > Of > Reversal On Breakout. A tail with large volume. I got out as well. > > -Bill Triffet > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Fisher" <Tim@orerockon.com> > To: <canslim@mail.xmission.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:37 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] A short ride > > > > Well that was certainly a short ride with UOPX and POSS. > Makes me wonder > > whether this is a big cap rally now. All after I put in orders for the > open > > today for NTBK and RBMG (neither of which is following suit, > thankfully). > > Anyway just really wanted to test the server since I don't > see any email > > from the group today. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] A short ride "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]