Re: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies


From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 22:07:34 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview - stock list "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies Warren Keuffel
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C1C7B6.D0CF33E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Patrick,

For the VV ProGraphics which I use and described in my message to =
Warren, there is no initial cost. There is a monthly subscription fee =
that is all inclusive. No additional fees for data feeds, etc, as =
everything you need is downloaded to your PC. (There is also an online =
version, but I prefer the PC based product. I have access to both for my =
monthly fee) $49/month for daily updates, $39/month for weekly updates. =
(discounts for yearly subscriptions). Basic graphing capabilities =
including price/volume, moving averages, graphing all parameters over =
time, etc. is inclusive. (http://www.vectorvest.com/VVPGDetail2.htm) My =
extended database has data back to '95.

The optional super-souped-up technical add-on (ProTrader) has a one time =
charge (I think it's about $295) but there are no fees after that, as =
all the data is pulled from ProGraphics. =
(http://www.vectorvest.com/VVPTDetail2.htm) My understanding is that =
those who are in love with TC2000, MetaStock, etc. will find ProTrader =
somewhat lacking. It still has some pretty incredible things....but =
technicians-at-heart love what they love.

No hidden charges...never any upgrade fees (I've been using it since =
early '98)... great technical support by phone and/or email.

You can order a 5 week trial for $9.95. (I would be remiss not to =
mention that I get credit for referrals but you have to mention me by =
name when you order) End of pitch...no connection to VV, just a very =
happy long term user who's learned to make the product sing.

As a CANSLIMer, I think that you could use VV and then supplement it =
with free fundamental resources on the web. But, if you're a fundamental =
junkie, then I think it is useful to supplement it with something like =
QP2 (or its derivative products) or DGO. Since I don't care about =
*mining* on raw fundamentals, I think DGO is the better option, as all =
the proprietary IBD indicators are readily available.

Katherine

PS There are also some articles at the VV site which describe in greater =
detail some of what I wrote about in my original note to Warren. =
http://www.vectorvest.com/specialreports.htm
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Patrick Wahl=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies


  What does it cost - initially and per month?

  On 9 Mar 2002 at 19:01, Katherine Malm wrote:

  > Hi Warren,
  >=20
  > It's difficult to do justice to the VV tool in a few paragraphs, but =
I will try and address your question in a way that shows how VV is =
different from tools such as QP2 (and tools built on its engine and/or =
MarketGuide fundamental data elements) and/or other tools that =
incorporate varying=20
  degrees of technical analysis.
  >=20
  > It is true the VV does not have the raw historical fundamental data =
and it is for this and a couple of other reasons that I supplement it =
with DGO. Instead of providing the raw numbers, VV devotes its engine to =
looking for relationships between variables. The foundational parameters =
are built=20
  on long-standing stock-valuation techniques in which the value of a =
stock is determined by the present value of a future earnings stream =
given a particular growth rate in future earnings and a given interest =
and inflation rate. This valuation is then combined with the past =
profitability=20
  characteristics of the company--essentially the return on total =
capital employed. The final valuation is then compared to present price =
action and the expected return on the stock over time is compared to the =
return on a AAA bond. While the specifics are proprietary (just as are =
the specifics of=20
  DGO's A/D, GRS, SMR, etc.), the formulations are discussed in the =
manual. In short, this allows you to compare any stock in the database =
against another to determine the relative value (RV) of the stock. In =
addition to the RV, there is also a relative safety (RS) factor which =
takes not only the=20
  traditional measure of volatility (beta--a price based measure) but =
also the past fundamental volatility/safety of the stock. For example, =
D/E ratio, longevity of the business, persistence of profitability and =
growth in earnings, etc. etc. All of these factors are once again =
combined so that any=20
  one stock can be compared against another. Essentially, VV pares down =
all the raw past fundamental data and the future expected fundamentals =
into a couple of numbers for you. When I look at a stream of raw =
fundamentals, this is what I'm doing mentally...assessing growth =
patterns, repeatability,=20
  etc. So, no, you could not do a search on QoQ growth rates of x in the =
same way you can in QP2. From a technical perspective, there is once =
again a summary technical price indicator called relative timing (RT) =
which is difficult to describe without a white paper. But, it =
essentially takes the=20
  price movement over the last 13 weeks and the velocity of the price =
movement in more recent periods and then normalizes it for values =
between 0 and 2. Once again, this allows comparison of any one stock =
against another. (There are many more parameters, but these are the most =
important). From a=20
  CANSLIM perspective, the parameter most important is the projected =
forward growth rate of the company. Without a doubt, this one factor =
(based on forward EPS estimates, also given) is the fastest way to zoom =
in on CANSLIM quality companies and as far as I've been able to =
determine, no other=20
  software package has anything close.
  >=20


  -
  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C1C7B6.D0CF33E0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Hi Patrick,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>For the VV ProGraphics which I use and described in my message to =
Warren,=20
there is no initial cost. There is a monthly subscription fee that is =
all=20
inclusive. No additional fees for data feeds, etc, as everything you =
need is=20
downloaded to your PC. (There is also an online version, but I prefer =
the PC=20
based product. I have access to both for my monthly fee)&nbsp;$49/month =
for=20
daily updates, $39/month for weekly updates. (discounts for yearly=20
subscriptions). Basic graphing capabilities including price/volume, =
moving=20
averages, graphing all parameters over time, etc. is inclusive. (<A=20
href=3D"http://www.vectorvest.com/VVPGDetail2.htm">http://www.vectorvest.=
com/VVPGDetail2.htm</A>)=20
My extended database has data back to '95.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>The optional super-souped-up technical add-on (ProTrader) has a one =
time=20
charge (I think it's about $295) but there are no fees after that, as =
all the=20
data is pulled from ProGraphics. (<A=20
href=3D"http://www.vectorvest.com/VVPTDetail2.htm">http://www.vectorvest.=
com/VVPTDetail2.htm</A>)=20
My understanding is that those who are in love with TC2000, MetaStock, =
etc. will=20
find ProTrader somewhat lacking. It still has some pretty incredible=20
things....but technicians-at-heart love what they love.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>No hidden charges...never any upgrade fees (I've been using it =
since early=20
'98)... great technical support by phone and/or email.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>You can order a 5 week trial for $9.95. (I would be remiss not to =
mention=20
that I get credit for referrals but you have to mention me by name when =
you=20
order) End of pitch...no connection to VV, just a very happy long term =
user=20
who's learned to make the product sing.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>As a CANSLIMer, I think that you could use VV and then supplement =
it with=20
free fundamental resources on the web. But, if you're a fundamental =
junkie, then=20
I think it is useful to supplement it with something like QP2 (or its =
derivative=20
products)&nbsp;or DGO. Since I don't care about *mining* on raw =
fundamentals, I=20
think DGO is the better option, as all the proprietary IBD indicators =
are=20
readily available.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>PS There are also some articles at the VV site which describe in =
greater=20
detail some of what I wrote about in my original note to Warren. <A=20
href=3D"http://www.vectorvest.com/specialreports.htm">http://www.vectorve=
st.com/specialreports.htm</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dpjwahl@attbi.com href=3D"mailto:pjwahl@attbi.com">Patrick =
Wahl</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, March 09, 2002 =
9:26=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
VectorVest=20
  fundies</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>What does it cost - initially and per month?<BR><BR>On =
9 Mar=20
  2002 at 19:01, Katherine Malm wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; Hi Warren,<BR>&gt; =
<BR>&gt;=20
  It's difficult to do justice to the VV tool in a few paragraphs, but I =
will=20
  try and address your question in a way that shows how VV is different =
from=20
  tools such as QP2 (and tools built on its engine and/or MarketGuide=20
  fundamental data elements) and/or other tools that incorporate varying =

  <BR>degrees of technical analysis.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; It is true the VV =
does not=20
  have the raw historical fundamental data and it is for this and a =
couple of=20
  other reasons that I supplement it with DGO. Instead of providing the =
raw=20
  numbers, VV devotes its engine to looking for relationships between =
variables.=20
  The foundational parameters are built <BR>on long-standing =
stock-valuation=20
  techniques in which the value of a stock is determined by the present =
value of=20
  a future earnings stream given a particular growth rate in future =
earnings and=20
  a given interest and inflation rate. This valuation is then combined =
with the=20
  past profitability <BR>characteristics of the company--essentially the =
return=20
  on total capital employed. The final valuation is then compared to =
present=20
  price action and the expected return on the stock over time is =
compared to the=20
  return on a AAA bond. While the specifics are proprietary (just as are =
the=20
  specifics of <BR>DGO's A/D, GRS, SMR, etc.), the formulations are =
discussed in=20
  the manual. In short, this allows you to compare any stock in the =
database=20
  against another to determine the relative value (RV) of the stock. In =
addition=20
  to the RV, there is also a relative safety (RS) factor which takes not =
only=20
  the <BR>traditional measure of volatility (beta--a price based =
measure) but=20
  also the past fundamental volatility/safety of the stock. For example, =
D/E=20
  ratio, longevity of the business, persistence of profitability and =
growth in=20
  earnings, etc. etc. All of these factors are once again combined so =
that any=20
  <BR>one stock can be compared against another. Essentially, VV pares =
down all=20
  the raw past fundamental data and the future expected fundamentals =
into a=20
  couple of numbers for you. When I look at a stream of raw =
fundamentals, this=20
  is what I'm doing mentally...assessing growth patterns, repeatability, =

  <BR>etc. So, no, you could not do a search on QoQ growth rates of x in =
the=20
  same way you can in QP2. From a technical perspective, there is once =
again a=20
  summary technical price indicator called relative timing (RT) which is =

  difficult to describe without a white paper. But, it essentially takes =
the=20
  <BR>price movement over the last 13 weeks and the velocity of the =
price=20
  movement in more recent periods and then normalizes it for values =
between 0=20
  and 2. Once again, this allows comparison of any one stock against =
another.=20
  (There are many more parameters, but these are the most important). =
From a=20
  <BR>CANSLIM perspective, the parameter most important is the projected =
forward=20
  growth rate of the company. Without a doubt, this one factor (based on =
forward=20
  EPS estimates, also given) is the fastest way to zoom in on CANSLIM =
quality=20
  companies and as far as I've been able to determine, no other =
<BR>software=20
  package has anything close.<BR>&gt; <BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20
  subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
 the=20
  email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim".&nbsp; Do=20
  not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C1C7B6.D0CF33E0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview - stock list "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] VectorVest fundies Warren Keuffel
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.