Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@netside.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Microcap Question
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:33:17 -0500
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Intro: Ed Gjertsen II "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] PPDI Steve F
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1CA0D.860A92B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
OK, I am home and will jump in here.I will try not to get too technical =
or windy.
First, keep in mind that NASDAQ and NYSE/AMEX work differently. The =
first is a population of independent market makers, each with their own =
bid and ask price. The latter is generally represented by a floor =
trader, who represents the "book" (all bids and offers) on a particular =
security.
In both cases, what you "see" on quotes / live quotes is the best bid =
(highest price) and best offer (lowest price). With a stock on =
NYSE/AMEX, typically the same floor trader is responsible for both =
prices. With Naz, the bid may be one firm, the ask another.=20
When you enter a Naz order, the firm holding your order can either =
execute it themselves, or farm it out to another firm. But either way, =
you should always get the best bid (highest) or ask (lowest). Exceptions =
would occur when you have special conditions on your order, such as AON =
(All Or None), or a limit price. So a buy order of 6K at a price of .99 =
might not execute if the best offer was only good for a few hundred =
shares, and the next best offer was at 1.01. On the other hand, the same =
order to buy 6K shares at "market" might well have executed at 99 cents, =
because a market order will take precedence over a limit order. At =
worse, it might have executed a penny or so higher in most cases.
Orders up to 1,000 shares can be automatically executed against another =
firm using SOES (Small Order Execution System). These can happen at =
lightening speed, even faster than that market maker is able to adjust =
their quote. I have seen a MM offering 5K shares get hit by SOES so fast =
that they lose 7 or 8K shares before they can raise their offer. Often =
this may force them then to go in and bid higher for stock to cover the =
difference. I have also often seen a MM that is not paying attention, =
and has a bid or offer out there for 100 or several hundred shares, and =
not realize that they have become the best price. So their quote appears =
as the "best", but it's not real because it's so small in size.
A MM can drop his bid to try and force execution of some stop loss =
orders, but he only knows about those stop loss orders on his own books, =
he cannot see all Naz orders. Nor can he cause other MM to drop their =
bid, and it still takes an execution, not a bid, to trigger a stop loss =
order. Even if he gets sell or stop loss orders, he must still honor the =
best market bid price (or give it to another MM) until that falls to his =
new level.
I haven't sat on a Trading Desk for nearly four years, so some things =
may have changed, but I think a Broker Dealer still has 90 seconds to =
report each execution to NASDAQ, and cause the resulting print. So in =
that time interval, on a volatile stock, you could see the display of =
the best bid and ask change several times, and appear to be out of whack =
with the eventual print of a prior trade.
Tom Worley
stkguru@netside.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----=20
From: Rob Miller=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Microcap Question
Ian,
Thanks for answering my question. I wasn't aware that a market maker =
could ignore the highest bid like that. If I understand you right, a =
market maker can drop the bid to a point where a number of stop orders =
will be executed, allowing him to accumulate shares, despite the =
prevailing bid remaining at the higher price. So if I had the =
prevailing bid, he can force sellers to take a lower price even though I =
was willing to pay a higher price. That sounds unethical as well as =
illegal.
Rob =20
- ----- Original Message -----=20
From: Ian=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Microcap Question
Often times, you will see that activity in microcaps as the market =
maker takes out stops set at $6.99 and buys some shares. You will =
frequently see it right before a volume surge - they see some volume =
bids coming in, and quickly drop the price in order to accumulate some =
inventory by taking out stop-loss orders.
Last week, I was trying to buy shares in a penny stock (my first in =
years, but all the CANSLIM characteristics save the low price). The =
bid-ask was 0.96 x 0.99. I but in an offer to buy another 6000 shares at =
0.99. I was watching a streamer and noticed that 40000 shares traded at =
or below 0.99, so I assumed that my order was filled. At the end of the =
day the price was 1.10, so I looked at my account and saw that I was NOT =
filled! The moral is that you are subject to some nasty (unethical?) =
trading practices as liquidity and price get low. The stock is at 1.40 =
today, 4 trading days later :(
Ian
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Rob Miller=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:20 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Microcap Question
Tom, I'm hoping you can answer this question for me since microcaps =
are your main interest. I've not dealt with them much in the past. =
I've been following a few microcaps (<$80 million market cap) and I'm =
confused about the movements in the bid/ask prices. Assume the spread =
is 7 X 7.15 with most trades, small lots, split evenly between those =
hitting the bid and those taking the ask. However, the action is slow. =
Then, the bid suddenly drops to 6.90, 6.85, 6.80, 6.75. Several trades =
go off at 6.75 over just a few seconds, then the bid jumps back up to =
7.00, at which point the trading becomes slow again. The ask never =
changes. In some cases, trades go off below the bid price. =20
I can understand when someone withdraws their bid causing the bid to =
drop, but it seems strange that several trades go off at what appears to =
be far below the prevailing market price. No trades, bid drops for a =
few seconds, a few quick trades, then bid goes back up. What causes =
this? It seems to scripted to be accidental. =20
Thanks,
Rob=20
- ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1CA0D.860A92B0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2713.1100" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>OK, I am home and will jump in here.I will try =
not to get=20
too technical or windy.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>First, keep in mind that NASDAQ and NYSE/AMEX =
work=20
differently. The first is a population of independent market makers, =
each with=20
their own bid and ask price. The latter is generally represented by a =
floor=20
trader, who represents the "book" (all bids and offers) on a particular=20
security.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>In both cases, what you "see" on quotes / live =
quotes is=20
the best bid (highest price) and best offer (lowest price). With a stock =
on=20
NYSE/AMEX, typically the same floor trader is responsible for both =
prices. With=20
Naz, the bid may be one firm, the ask another. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>When you enter a Naz order, the firm holding =
your order=20
can either execute it themselves, or farm it out to another firm. But =
either=20
way, you should always get the best bid (highest) or ask (lowest).=20
Exceptions would occur when you have special conditions on your order, =
such as=20
AON (All Or None), or a limit price. So a buy order of 6K at a price of =
.99=20
might not execute if the best offer was only good for a few hundred =
shares, and=20
the next best offer was at 1.01. On the other hand, the same order to =
buy 6K=20
shares at "market" might well have executed at 99 cents, because a =
market order=20
will take precedence over a limit order. At worse, it might have =
executed a=20
penny or so higher in most cases.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Orders up to 1,000 shares can be automatically =
executed=20
against another firm using SOES (Small Order Execution System). These =
can happen=20
at lightening speed, even faster than that market maker is able to =
adjust their=20
quote. I have seen a MM offering 5K shares get hit by SOES so fast that =
they=20
lose 7 or 8K shares before they can raise their offer. Often this may =
force them=20
then to go in and bid higher for stock to cover the difference. I =
have=20
also often seen a MM that is not paying attention, and has a bid or =
offer out=20
there for 100 or several hundred shares, and not realize that they have =
become=20
the best price. So their quote appears as the "best", but it's not real =
because=20
it's so small in size.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>A MM can drop his bid to try and force execution =
of some=20
stop loss orders, but he only knows about those stop loss orders on his =
own=20
books, he cannot see all Naz orders. Nor can he cause other MM to drop =
their=20
bid, and it still takes an execution, not a bid, to trigger a stop loss =
order.=20
Even if he gets sell or stop loss orders, he must still honor the best =
market=20
bid price (or give it to another MM) until that falls to his new=20
level.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I haven't sat on a Trading Desk for nearly four =
years, so=20
some things may have changed, but I think a Broker Dealer still has 90 =
seconds=20
to report each execution to NASDAQ, and cause the resulting print. So in =
that=20
time interval, on a volatile stock, you could see the display of the =
best bid=20
and ask change several times, and appear to be out of whack with the =
eventual=20
print of a prior trade.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@netside.net">stkguru@netside.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
TexWorley</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
title=3Drmiller2@carolina.rr.com =
href=3D"mailto:rmiller2@carolina.rr.com">Rob=20
Miller</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:24 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Microcap Question</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ian,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for answering my question. =
I wasn't=20
aware that a market maker could ignore the highest bid like that. =
If I=20
understand you right, a market maker can drop the bid to a point where a =
number=20
of stop orders will be executed, allowing him to accumulate shares, =
despite the=20
prevailing bid remaining at the higher price. So if =
I had the=20
prevailing bid, he can force sellers to take a lower price even though I =
was=20
willing to pay a higher price. That sounds unethical as well as=20
illegal.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rob =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dianstm@shaw.ca href=3D"mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca">Ian</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, March 12, 2002 =
1:09=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Microcap =
Question</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Often times, you will see that activity in =
microcaps as the=20
market maker takes out stops set at $6.99 and buys some shares. You =
will=20
frequently see it right before a volume surge - they see some volume =
bids=20
coming in, and quickly drop the price in order to accumulate some =
inventory by=20
taking out stop-loss orders.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Last week, I was trying to buy shares in a penny =
stock (my=20
first in years, but all the CANSLIM characteristics save the low =
price). The=20
bid-ask was 0.96 x 0.99. I but in an offer to buy another 6000 shares =
at 0.99.=20
I was watching a streamer and noticed that 40000 shares traded at or =
below=20
0.99, so I assumed that my order was filled. At the end of the day the =
price=20
was 1.10, so I looked at my account and saw that I was NOT filled! The =
moral=20
is that you are subject to some nasty (unethical?) trading practices =
as=20
liquidity and price get low. The stock is at 1.40 today, 4 trading =
days later=20
:(</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Ian</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Drmiller2@carolina.rr.com =
href=3D"mailto:rmiller2@carolina.rr.com">Rob=20
Miller</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, March 12, 2002 =
7:20=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Microcap=20
Question</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom, I'm hoping you can answer this =
question=20
for me since microcaps are your main interest. I've not dealt =
with=20
them much in the past. I've been following a few microcaps =
(<$80=20
million market cap) and I'm confused about the movements in the =
bid/ask=20
prices. Assume the spread is 7 X 7.15 with most trades, =
small=20
lots, split evenly between those hitting the bid and those taking =
the=20
ask. However, the action is slow. Then, the bid suddenly =
drops=20
to 6.90, 6.85, 6.80, 6.75. Several trades go off at 6.75 over =
just a=20
few seconds, then the bid jumps back up to 7.00, at which point the =
trading=20
becomes slow again. The ask never changes. In some =
cases, trades=20
go off below the bid price. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I can understand when someone =
withdraws their=20
bid causing the bid to drop, but it seems strange that several =
trades go=20
off at what appears to be far below the prevailing market=20
price. No trades, bid drops for a few seconds, a few =
quick=20
trades, then bid goes back up. What causes this? It =
seems=20
to scripted to be accidental. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Rob</FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1CA0D.860A92B0--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Intro: Ed Gjertsen II "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] PPDI Steve F
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]