Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "William King" <wk11@adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:29:21 -0500
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] MicroCaps "Rich W"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM]New Member "Rich W"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member "William King"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C1D18C.6E2C2CE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Katherine. Tom Worley suggested I try a 1 month trial so I can =
make a comparison based on my own needs.
Bill King
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member
Hi Bill,
Welcome!
I use DGO (DailyGraphs) so can speak to my personal reasons for =
choosing DGO over TC2000--
-DGO includes the O'Neil proprietary indicators such as EPS, SMR, RS, =
Timeliness, etc.
-DGO includes a bevy of fundamental indicators along with the =
technical Price/Volume action on a 2 page chart for each stock.
-DGO indicates significant developments that can affect the stock =
price such as company stock buy-backs, etc.
-DGO includes indicators for actions that O'Neil considers significant =
such as primary/secondary stock offerings, articles in major =
publications, etc.
-the new beta includes a far more comprehensive set of =
filtering/scanning capabilities than does the current version and allows =
you to find stocks meeting certain fundamental, technical and/or =
proprietary ranking criteria.
-if you are a CANSLIMer in the traditional sense and utilize the =
proprietary rankings, an alternative is to use the IBD site to look them =
up, but the tools there are far more limited than DGO, forcing you to =
look up each individual stock.
For someone who uses technicals extensively, TC2000 is a far better =
technical package than DGO. There are quite a few on the list who use it =
and can list their reasons for choosing it over DGO.
www.dailygraphs.com or=20
beta.dailygraphs.com
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: William King=20
To: canslim@xmission.com=20
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:45 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM]New Member
Hi - My name is Bill King. I am one of the new members that came as =
a result of the Forbes item. Am a long time investor that was =
unsuccessful over the past 2 years under the guidance of a "financial =
advisor", so decided to manage my own investments using the canslim =
approach. So far the environment hasn't been to good for investing so I =
am watching(lurking) and trying to learn from you folks, IBD, =
investors.com, O'Neil's book and tapes, etc.
I am a TC2000 user, would I be better off with Daily Graphs based =
on your experience?
Thanks,
Bill King
- ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C1D18C.6E2C2CE0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4913.1100" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks Katherine. Tom Worley suggested =
I try a 1=20
month trial so I can make a comparison based on my own =
needs.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Bill King</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
Malm</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, March 22, 2002 =
10:03=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM]New =
Member</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Hi Bill,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Welcome!</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I use DGO (DailyGraphs) so can speak to my personal reasons for =
choosing=20
DGO over TC2000--</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>-DGO includes the O'Neil proprietary indicators such as EPS, SMR, =
RS,=20
Timeliness, etc.</DIV>
<DIV>-DGO includes a bevy of fundamental indicators along with the =
technical=20
Price/Volume action on a 2 page chart for each stock.</DIV>
<DIV>-DGO indicates significant developments that can affect the stock =
price such as company stock buy-backs, etc.</DIV>
<DIV>-DGO includes indicators for actions that O'Neil considers =
significant=20
such as primary/secondary stock offerings, articles in major =
publications,=20
etc.</DIV>
<DIV>-the new beta includes a far more comprehensive set of =
filtering/scanning=20
capabilities than does the current version and allows you to find =
stocks=20
meeting certain fundamental, technical and/or proprietary=20
ranking criteria.</DIV>
<DIV>-if you are a CANSLIMer in the traditional sense and utilize the=20
proprietary rankings, an alternative is to use the IBD site to look =
them up,=20
but the tools there are far more limited than DGO, forcing you to look =
up each=20
individual stock.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>For someone who uses technicals extensively, TC2000 is a far =
better=20
technical package than DGO. There are quite a few on the list who use =
it and=20
can list their reasons for choosing it over DGO.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A =
href=3D"http://www.dailygraphs.com">www.dailygraphs.com</A> or=20
</DIV>
<DIV>beta.dailygraphs.com</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dwk11@adelphia.net =
href=3D"mailto:wk11@adelphia.net">William King</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@xmission.com=20
href=3D"mailto:canslim@xmission.com">canslim@xmission.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, March 22, 2002 =
8:45=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM]New =
Member</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi - My name is Bill King. I am one =
of the new=20
members that came as a result of the Forbes item. Am a long time =
investor=20
that was unsuccessful over the past 2 years under the guidance of a=20
"financial advisor", so decided to manage my own investments using =
the=20
canslim approach. So far the environment hasn't been to good for =
investing=20
so I am watching(lurking) and trying to learn from you folks, IBD,=20
investors.com, O'Neil's book and tapes, etc.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I am a TC2000 user, would I be =
better off =20
with Daily Graphs based on your experience?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Bill=20
King</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C1D18C.6E2C2CE0--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] MicroCaps "Rich W"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM]New Member "Rich W"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member "William King"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]