Re: [CANSLIM]New Member

From: "William King" <wk11@adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:08:09 -0500

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM]New Member "William King"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM]New Member "Mike Lucero"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member Spencer48@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member "William King"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Thanks - I do plan to take Tom's suggestion and try DGO for a month.

Bill
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]New Member


> Bill:
>
>      I use both and could not add to anything Tom
> ( "Hi Bill, and welcome to the group I have never used TC2000, so can't
> comment on comparisons. But I have been using WON products for well over
12
> years, so am comfortable with them and would hate to stop my access.  DGO
> gives me an array of data, and has largely eliminated my due diligence
> efforts. Since you are already familiar with what you get from TC2000, why
> not take a trial on DGO and see for yourself if it helps you." )
> or Katherine ( "Welcome!    I use DGO (DailyGraphs) so can speak to my
> personal reasons for choosing DGO over TC2000--  -DGO includes the O'Neil
> proprietary indicators such as EPS, SMR, RS, Timeliness, etc. -DGO
includes a
> bevy of fundamental indicators along with the technical Price/Volume
action
> on a 2 page chart for each stock.
>  -DGO indicates significant developments that can affect the stock price
such
> as company stock buy-backs, etc.
>  -DGO includes indicators for actions that O'Neil considers significant
such
> as primary/secondary stock offerings, articles in major publications, etc.
>  -the new beta includes a far more comprehensive set of filtering/scanning
> capabilities than does the current version and allows you to find stocks
> meeting certain fundamental, technical and/or proprietary ranking
criteria.
> -if you are a CANSLIMer in the traditional sense and utilize the
proprietary
> rankings, an alternative is to use the IBD site to look them up, but the
> tools there are far more limited than DGO, forcing you to look up each
> individual stock.   For someone who uses technicals extensively, TC2000 is
a
> far better technical package than DGO. There are quite a few on the list
who
> use it and can list their reasons for choosing it over DGO." )
> say as to the advantages vs. disadvantages of one or the other.  TC2000
> provides a lot of methods of scanning, but DG's daily graphs are without
peer
> (The day's volume and price action seem to shoot out at you; for some
reason,
> TC's weekly graphs are more readable to me-perhaps because I've been
relying
> on DG daily chart for so long-so by comparison TC's daily charts seem
> lacking. I rarely use the DG Beta version for that reason:  It's
unneccessary
> usually, and I don't need any more superfluous information).  Moreover, as
> Tom and Katherine observe, DG has a lot of fundamental information on
stocks
> right there on the graph.  I think Tom has the best idea, since only you
know
> what value to place on things, why not try DG and see how it compares with
TC?
>
> jans
>
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.