Re: [CANSLIM] MTEC

From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] MTEC
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:37:23 EST

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] MTEC "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] gold/Japan "Robert McGill"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] MTEC Warren Keuffel
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] MTEC "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Tom:

     It is indeed puzzling how well MTEC (the company) did in the past few 
months considering how ho-hum it was prior to the recent quarter-then one 
looks at the industry group it is in.   And then one sees what the company 
actually does.  Perhaps the anomalous quarter (and the  projection that next 
year the company won't do so well) is based on 9/11.  After 9/11 every 
medical institution wanted to innoculate and give vaccines to prevent the 
possible success of terrorist's biological weapons.  Many individuals also 
wanted to be protected with vaccinations. Thus a company like MTEC which 
designs and develops medical devices (including pre-filled syringes) likely 
profited, and their bottom line earnings and sales leap reflects that.  

jans



In a message dated 3/24/2002 2:57:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:

<< At a glance, their numbers don't make sense to me. Latest qtr (2nd) both
 earnings and sales show a huge jump over what they had been doing. Thru the
 first six months, they are on track to far surpass the year's forecast
 (assuming Q2 is indicative of Q3 and Q4). Yet the forecast for next year
 shows a 19% decline. >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.