Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool

From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:37:04 -0600
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Mike Gibbons"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C1D3F9.C4D81EE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mike,

The posts here on the list are frequently peppered with discussions =
about the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM =
consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, =
condition of the market and its conduciveness to CANSLIM stocks, whether =
the WON guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data =
from various sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't =
necessarily read anything into the lack of debate over your tool or its =
data elements.

Katherine
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Mike Gibbons=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:24 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool



  Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) =
have been
  overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least =
once
  and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are using =
it
  extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by one list
  subscriber in a single day!

  Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are =
making
  of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the =
validity
  of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I =
was
  expecting a lively debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their
  applicability in the recent market conditions.

  For those of you who may have missed it, the link is
  http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim

  Aloha,

  Mike Gibbons
  Proactive Technologies, LLC
  http://www.proactech.com



  -
  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

- ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C1D3F9.C4D81EE0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Hi Mike,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>The posts here on the list are frequently peppered with discussions =
about=20
the validity of breakouts, validity of "standard" CANSLIM=20
consolidation/technical patterns, industry strength as an indicator, =
condition=20
of the market and its conduciveness to CANSLIM stocks, whether the WON=20
guidelines for EPS/RS can be "stretched", the validity of data from =
various=20
sources (QP2, MarketGuide, Yahoo, DGO), etc. I wouldn't necessarily read =

anything into the lack of debate over your tool or its data =
elements.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dmike@proactech.com href=3D"mailto:mike@proactech.com">Mike =
Gibbons</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, March 25, 2002 =
12:24=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Canslim =
Evaluation=20
  Tool</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV><BR>Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I =
(and my=20
  server) have been<BR>overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have =
used the=20
  tool at least once<BR>and several of you have accessed it frequently. =
Some of=20
  you are using it<BR>extensively - the current record is 100 stocks =
analyzed by=20
  one list<BR>subscriber in a single day!<BR><BR>Apart from being =
pleasantly=20
  surprized at the use that many of you are making<BR>of it, I'm also =
surprized=20
  that only one of you has questioned the validity<BR>of the data, and =
the=20
  assumptions that go into the pass/fail ranking. I was<BR>expecting a =
lively=20
  debate about the definitions of CANSLIM and their<BR>applicability in =
the=20
  recent market conditions.<BR><BR>For those of you who may have missed =
it, the=20
  link is<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim">http://www.cwhcharts.com/cansli=
m</A><BR><BR>Aloha,<BR><BR>Mike=20
  Gibbons<BR>Proactive Technologies, LLC<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://www.proactech.com">http://www.proactech.com</A><BR><BR><BR=
><BR>-<BR>-To=20
  subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
 the=20
  email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim".&nbsp; Do=20
  not use quotes in your email.</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01C1D3F9.C4D81EE0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.