QGLY (was Re: [CANSLIM] "M")

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: QGLY (was Re: [CANSLIM] "M")
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:29:04 -0500

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] cwh "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] "M" "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Hi Ian,

My growth small / micro caps in my VR (Virtual Reality) Fund have started to
look a little stronger, but with an overweighing in techs (per S&P, over 61%
in Information Technology) my overall performance has not been so great
(Industrials have given a much better percentage return).

QGLY fundies look good, I don't see any obvious over valuation issues, but
the spike would seem sufficient to create some major profit taking
nonetheless.

Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian" <ianstm@shaw.ca>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M"


Tom:

My Marketocracy fund is hitting new highs almost daily. Lots of strong
microcaps out there. But I admit that I'm feeling lucky I loaded up on the
QGLY breakout on the 11'th at $4. It was a classic technical breakout,
following a decent quarter. Annoyingly, in a brain-dead moment - I failed to
actually buy any real shares for myself.

Anyone have an opinion on whether or not todays QGLY spike is just a
daytraders plaything, or will it catch strong institutional support?


Ian


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:54 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] "M"


> Haven't had much talk on "M" lately, aside from the one post on VIX (which
I
> agree with, by the way, it's staying too low for comfort).
>
> Took a fast look around this morning, and noticed the severe overbought
> conditions on both NYSE and NASDAQ have corrected to neutral. And 10 day
> moving average of up/down volume is now slightly negative on NYSE and
> substantially more on Naz.
>
> 10 day moving average of new highs remains moderately positive on both of
> these exchanges.
>
> The S&P500 chart looks surprisingly healthy (at least to me). And the
> Russell 2000 has done better than I perceived from my portfolios. The rest
> looked decent if they can hold in this area, or better still start
trending
> up.
>
> Tom Worley
> stkguru@bellsouth.net
> AIM: TexWorley
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] cwh "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] "M" "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.