From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] cwh
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:04:44 -0500
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] "M" "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] "M" "Hill, Ernie"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] cwh "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00E7_01C1D451.74290790 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One further observation on KO, United Airlines just switched to Pepsi. = Ugghh, one more reason not to fly United. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tom Worley=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] cwh Hi Charles, CMOS - yes, but takes more than a pretty chart to be CANSLIM. RS of 64 = and EPS of 31 takes it off any CS list. Volume in the handle has also = not declined, WON likes a drooping handle, I personally prefer a flat = handle. Forecasts for earnings this year a sharp decline. KO - same comments mostly, plus very extended, yet volume has not = exceeded 2X ADV SGY - again, RS and EPS (30 and 13) take it off anything but possibly a = value based list. At least it has positive earnings forecast for this = year. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: charles wilfong=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:13 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] cwh Are these valid cwh? CMOS KO SGY - ------=_NextPart_000_00E7_01C1D451.74290790 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2713.1100" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>One further observation on KO, United Airlines = just=20 switched to Pepsi. Ugghh, one more reason not to fly = United.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20 TexWorley</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom = Worley</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Monday, March 25, 2002 11:00 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] cwh</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Hi Charles,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>CMOS - yes, but takes more than a pretty chart = to be=20 CANSLIM. RS of 64 and EPS of 31 takes it off any CS list. Volume in the = handle=20 has also not declined, WON likes a drooping handle, I personally prefer = a flat=20 handle. Forecasts for earnings this year a sharp decline.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>KO - same comments mostly, plus very extended, = yet volume=20 has not exceeded 2X ADV</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>SGY - again, RS and EPS (30 and 13) take it off = anything=20 but possibly a value based list. At least it has positive earnings = forecast for=20 this year.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20 TexWorley</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3D10charles@email.msn.com = href=3D"mailto:10charles@email.msn.com">charles=20 wilfong</A> </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Monday, March 25, 2002 9:13 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] cwh</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Are these valid cwh?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>CMOS</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>KO</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>SGY</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_00E7_01C1D451.74290790-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] "M" "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] "M" "Hill, Ernie"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] cwh "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]