RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool

From: "Duke Miller" <dukemill@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:09:07 -0500

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Bill Triffet"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Worley's Weekend Weeview "Steven E.Hess"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Bill Triffet"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Bill,

Great input here.  How about a show of hands of those who've been
stopped out of A+ Stock Checkup stocks!

And as always, thanks, Mike.  I'm one of the heavy users, and if it
doesn't hit 6/11 or better, I'm onto the next one.

Duke

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Bill Triffet
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 1:56 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool


Mike,

First, I'd like to say thanks for the tool.

I have yet to see anyone else - WON's products included - attempt to do
something so basic as rate a stock directly to the c-a-n-s-l-i-m acronym
attributes. Maybe because it's such a subjective thing that it's easier
to dance around the numbers than really grade a stock based on canslim.
The Stock Evaluator on the IBD site is pretty weak with in that regard.
I guess if they actually graded a stock on ACTUAL IBD canslim data that
would be construed as touting a stock. This is why most of us go to at
least 3-5 different places to review a stock or use Daily Graphs where
the data is all there but not exactly spelled out so as to not tout the
issue.

I think it's a great tool in addition to several others. Given it's
price
(g) I have no complaints and it comes close in some of the canslim
criteria for me. Things like (M)arket direction and (N)ew can be very
subjective and must be reviewed several ways. Come to think of it,
lately when I see a high
(L) rating it's usually extended as that is how it got there. I'm of the
consensus of several others here that with data being so immediate, it's
better to look for the gems in rising groups - not at the top.

- -Bill


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Gibbons" <mike@proactech.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:24 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool


>
> Since I released this tool to the group on 3/13, I (and my server) 
> have
been
> overwhelmed with the response. 182 of you have used the tool at least 
> once and several of you have accessed it frequently. Some of you are 
> using it extensively - the current record is 100 stocks analyzed by 
> one list subscriber in a single day!
>
> Apart from being pleasantly surprized at the use that many of you are
making
> of it, I'm also surprized that only one of you has questioned the 
> validity of the data, and the assumptions that go into the pass/fail 
> ranking. I was expecting a lively debate about the definitions of 
> CANSLIM and their applicability in the recent market conditions.
>
> For those of you who may have missed it, the link is 
> http://www.cwhcharts.com/canslim
>
> Aloha,
>
> Mike Gibbons
> Proactive Technologies, LLC
> http://www.proactech.com
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe 
> canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.