Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI

From: RWElmer@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] DFXI
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 22:15:03 EST

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] MGAM - Another conventional wisdom question "Leo Antons"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Tim Fisher"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

- --part1_18.1ce6ce09.29dbcdb7_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Jans,

Funny you mentioned the article Katherine posted because it was in reading it 
that my memory was jogged on those numbers on DFXI being troublesome (it has 
been a while since I studied them). I do appreciate your response, however.

In rereading my post I can understand the impression you formed regarding my 
apparent lack of respect for the time of others. This was unfortunate 
phrasing on my part. My only reason for even mentioning the items was to 
bring them to the attention to others who may have still been researching 
DFXI. I was just noting that, if somebody could shed light on the subject, 
I'd be interested to know their thoughts. I certainly was not trying to get 
somebody to do my DD for me; I've owned the stock for a while now and my 
decisions were made long ago.

I have not contributed much to this Board, as I'm not a dedicated CANSLIMer; 
my entry points tend to be off of bottoms. I saw an opportunity to contribute 
on DFXI, as I had done some research on it, and thought others might benefit 
from the couple of items I had made note of.

At any rate, no harm or disrespect intended. Thanks again for the response.

Regards,

Robert W. Elmer


- --part1_18.1ce6ce09.29dbcdb7_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Hello Jans,
<BR>
<BR>Funny you mentioned the article Katherine posted because it was in reading it that my memory was jogged on those numbers on DFXI being troublesome (it has been a while since I studied them). I do appreciate your response, however.
<BR>
<BR>In rereading my post I can understand the impression you formed regarding my apparent lack of respect for the time of others. This was unfortunate phrasing on my part. My only reason for even mentioning the items was to bring them to the attention to others who may have still been researching DFXI. I was just noting that, if somebody could shed light on the subject, I'd be interested to know their thoughts. I certainly was not trying to get somebody to do my DD for me; I've owned the stock for a while now and my decisions were made long ago.
<BR>
<BR>I have not contributed much to this Board, as I'm not a dedicated CANSLIMer; my entry points tend to be off of bottoms. I saw an opportunity to contribute on DFXI, as I had done some research on it, and thought others might benefit from the couple of items I had made note of.
<BR>
<BR>At any rate, no harm or disrespect intended. Thanks again for the response.
<BR>
<BR>Regards,
<BR>
<BR><B>Robert W. Elmer
<BR></B></FONT></HTML>

- --part1_18.1ce6ce09.29dbcdb7_boundary--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.