From: "Tim Fisher" <Tim@orerockon.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool
Date: 3 Apr 2002 20:20:34 -0800
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "William King"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "William King"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Tim Fisher"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Yeah, I like the charts, even MOVI, am so-so on the fundies, and that is the cream of my HGS crop. I never did pay any attn to the fundies beyond the fact that they meet my scan criteria, at least according to HGS data. At 08:09 PM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: >OK, Tim, I waded thru the emails, and so far no one was willing to take up >the challenge, so I'll put on my negatively biased trifocals and see if I >can find fault with these: > >KKD - as the longer terms members know, I love (read am addicted to) their >hot glazed donuts right off the rack. But could never be convinced that a >valuation multiple in the very high double digits was good investing. Still >am not with trailing PE of 88 and projected PE of 62. Short term trend >downward, breaking 50DMA today. > >SYPR - gotta be careful here, as I have this small cap in my VR Fund where I >have a small profit, 12 month trend clearly up, sequential earnings growth >support the big annual earnings forecasts for this year and next, I don't >like the much slower growth in sales, debt is high (114%), ROE is low (9%), >management ownership very high (87%) which means they can do anything they >want without shareholder recourse, including selling big blocks of their >stock or taking the company private at virtually any price. > >PER - single digit sales growth, weak earnings forecast (9 & 18% this year >and next) > >MOVI - erratic chart, wouldn't get excited about it till it breaks 20.16 on >volume, I don't trust the forecasts on this one, mostly gut sense of what >"people" are doing in real world vs right after 9/11 > >GPI - 6% earnings growth this year (above company forecasts) and 17% next >year doesn't excite me > >SAH - my economics flavor kicks in here, I don't see car sales doing well >this year, so can't believe the 21% earnings forecast even with the Don >Massey acquisitions, there's not that much juice after recent acquisitions >to bolster essentially flat earnings and sales that much, IMO > >TUES - I'll try to be gentle, since you own this one, and I rarely spend >money so am a poor judge of consumer habits, management has 72% of the >float, and funds got 43% of what's left, that's hefty, earnings way >unpredictable, from several pennies for three qtrs to 63 cents, I wouldn't >know what to expect?, debt a shocking 549% and cash flow essentially flat >with earnings > >FCN - had an easy year for comparisons in 2001, but 2002 will be far more >difficult, funds own 47% and management only owns 15%, cash flow below >earnings > >Nothing motivated me, I am continuing to build my cash reserves until "M" >cleans up its act, > >Tom Worley >stkguru@bellsouth.net >AIM: TexWorley >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tim Fisher" <Tim@orerockon.com> >To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> >Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:43 AM >Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > >Forgive me if I totally disagree with you. There are still quite a few >practically perfect CANSLIM stocks out there to discuss, i.e. DFXI, without >bringing up these extremely sub-par candidates. I would not discourage >anyone from bringing them up for discussion, just that when their faults >are pointed out, that the advice offered be taken for what it is, namely >free. Take it or ignore it, but always remember, YGWYPF! IMNSHO. Want >something to do with your free time? Rip these apart: > >KKD SYPR PER MOVI GPI SAH TUES FCN > >Hint: The C&H isn't the only chart formation out there, nor is it the one >that necessarily is the best CANSLIM buy, particularly in this M... > >At 09:16 AM 4/3/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >Easy, Tim: > > > >While the M's away the CANSLIMMERS must play! > > > >Duke > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > >[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tim Fisher > >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:19 PM > >To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > >Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool > > > > > >A stock 30% below its 52 wk high and with the 50dma under the 200 gets a > > > >10? Out of what, 100? Seriously, how is this a CANSLIM chart? > > > >Tim Fisher >Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site >Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. >mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com >WWW http://OreRockOn.com > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Tim Fisher"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "William King"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "William King"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Canslim Evaluation Tool "Tim Fisher"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]