From: "Rob Miller" <rmiller2@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Market Rally
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:02:26 -0400
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] BRLI "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ODSY "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Market Rally "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C1E137.99AF54E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm confused. I noticed that on investors.com today, WON (or whoever = answers these questions) states that there is no rally at this time = because we haven't had a FTD off recent lows. My understanding is that = a rally is intact as long as the first day of the rally attempt is not = undercut. Therefore, the rally beginning in February is still in force. = You could argue that the rally failed because so few Canslim stocks = were breaking out, but I don't recall that being a requirement to call = the rally a failure, only a measure of the rally's strength. IBD called = the last follow through day and I don't remember them calling the rally = a failure yet. I don't read IBD every day so I may be missing = something, but are they always this inconsistent. The columns on the = front page have also been questionable lately. =20 Rob - ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C1E137.99AF54E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm confused. I noticed that on = investors.com=20 today, WON (or whoever answers these questions) states that there is no = rally at=20 this time because we haven't had a FTD off recent lows. My = understanding=20 is that a rally is intact as long as the first day of the rally attempt = is not=20 undercut. Therefore, the rally beginning in February is still in=20 force. You could argue that the rally failed because so few = Canslim stocks=20 were breaking out, but I don't recall that being a requirement to call = the rally=20 a failure, only a measure of the rally's strength. IBD called the = last=20 follow through day and I don't remember them calling the rally a failure = yet. I don't read IBD every day so I may be missing something, but = are=20 they always this inconsistent. The columns on the front page have = also=20 been questionable lately. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rob</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C1E137.99AF54E0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] BRLI "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ODSY "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Market Rally "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]