Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?


From: "Ira Post" <ip108@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 12:42:34 -0400

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Robert McGill"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Robert McGill"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Robert McGill"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C1E3B1.D9FDF3E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mona and Katherine,

Very good points on market direction.  We'd all love to have another =
bull market, but we haven't sufficiently absorbed the last one.  P/E's =
are still very high.  I think a sideways move for a number of years is a =
very likely transition to whatever comes next.  I also agree that tech =
stocks will recover somewhat, but not lead the market like they did in =
the nineties.

Tech stocks are often like Hostess Twinkies.  They're so attractive, but =
usually lack substance.  One has to be very careful to use good due =
diligence on the financials on tech stocks like on every other stock.

Ira
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Katherine Malm=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 12:10 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?


  Hi Mona,

  Some comments on your points--

  1. I've always believed that the same steps in due diligence have to =
be taken on all stocks, regardless of the business, and I do this =
without exception. I look at it as the difference between reading an =
instruction manual and a good book. Both have value, one I plod through, =
the other I fly through.

  2. Agreed that little economic progress can be made without =
technological innovation, and this will continue to drive economic =
growth. However, the era of "all tech all the time" is over. Tech will =
continue to innovate, but the market will not necessarily be dominated =
by tech names in the same way it was in the last Bull. It's innovation =
in general that garners market winners. That innovation can take many =
forms from tech, to business market redefinition, new applications for =
existing technologies, etc.

  3. Pull out a chart of the market from the mid 1960's to about 1982. =
*That's* a sideways market. (You can see the same thing in the market =
after the crash of 1929. That sideways market went on until about 1949) =
Within a sideways market there are winners and losers, up and down =
waves, but the market as a whole from the beginning of the cycle to the =
end is for the most part flat. Exploiting sector rotation with the =
strongest stocks is key to successfully investing in such a market.

  Katherine
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Mona Guarino=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 1:52 PM
    Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?


    Katherine --=20

    1. on the one hand, due diligence on non-tech stocks may not be as =
exciting for the tech-minded among us, but as a newbie to the CANSLIM =
principles, I am finding that it forces me to stay focused on the =
investing process and I don't get as distracted by excitement of the the =
technology itself. For me, not a bad thing at the moment to have my =
focus enforced.

    2. I agree that tech is very unlikely to lead as it did before. But, =
I don't see intuitively how any overall improvement in the market can =
occur without at least improving tech's current position. How does =
anyone to it cheaper / better / faster without an effect on tech?

    3. In various messages, you seem to indicate that you believe the =
current directionlessness of the market will continue for years. =
Definietly think that that's where we are now and that it's not going to =
change in the next quarter or two, but wonder what suggests it will be =
many more years of this.

    -- Mona

- ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C1E3B1.D9FDF3E0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Mona and Katherine,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Very good points on market =
direction.&nbsp; We'd=20
all love to have another bull market, but we haven't sufficiently =
absorbed the=20
last one.&nbsp; P/E's are still very high.&nbsp; I think a sideways move =
for a=20
number of years is a very likely transition to whatever comes =
next.&nbsp; I also=20
agree that tech stocks will recover somewhat, but not lead the market =
like they=20
did in the nineties.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tech stocks are often like Hostess =
Twinkies.&nbsp;=20
They're so attractive, but usually lack substance.&nbsp; One has to be =
very=20
careful to use good due diligence on the financials on tech stocks like =
on every=20
other stock.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ira</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
  Malm</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 14, 2002 =
12:10=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Bear =
Rally?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Hi Mona,</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Some comments on your points--</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>1. I've always believed that the same steps in due diligence have =
to be=20
  taken on all stocks, regardless of the business, and I do this without =

  exception. I look at it as the difference between reading an =
instruction=20
  manual and a good book. Both have value, one I plod through, the other =
I fly=20
  through.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>2. Agreed that little economic progress can be made without =
technological=20
  innovation, and this will continue to drive economic growth. However, =
the era=20
  of "all tech all the time" is over. Tech will continue to innovate, =
but the=20
  market will not necessarily be dominated by tech names in the same way =
it was=20
  in the last Bull. It's innovation in general that garners market =
winners. That=20
  innovation can take many forms from tech, to business market =
redefinition, new=20
  applications for existing technologies, etc.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>3. Pull out a chart of the market from the mid 1960's to about =
1982.=20
  *That's* a sideways market. (You can see the same thing in the market =
after=20
  the crash of 1929. That sideways market went on until about 1949) =
Within a=20
  sideways market there are winners and losers, up and down waves, but =
the=20
  market as a whole from the beginning of the cycle to the end is for =
the most=20
  part flat. Exploiting sector rotation with the strongest =
stocks&nbsp;is key to=20
  successfully investing in such a market.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Katherine</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dwebmaster@design21.com =
href=3D"mailto:webmaster@design21.com">Mona=20
    Guarino</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 14, 2002 =
1:52=20
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [CANSLIM] Bear=20
Rally?</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
    class=3D510423418-14042002>Katherine -- </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
    class=3D510423418-14042002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D510423418-14042002>1.=20
    on the one hand, due diligence on non-tech stocks may not be as =
exciting for=20
    the tech-minded among us, but as a newbie to the CANSLIM principles, =
I am=20
    finding that it forces me to stay focused on the investing process =
and I=20
    don't get as distracted by excitement of the the technology itself. =
For me,=20
    not a bad thing at the moment to have my focus =
enforced.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
    class=3D510423418-14042002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D510423418-14042002>2.=20
    I agree that tech is very unlikely to lead as it did before. But, I =
don't=20
    see intuitively how any overall improvement in the market can occur =
without=20
    at least improving tech's current position. How does anyone to it =
cheaper /=20
    better / faster without an effect on tech?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
    class=3D510423418-14042002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
    class=3D510423418-14042002>3.&nbsp;In various messages, you seem to =
indicate=20
    that you believe the current directionlessness of the market will =
continue=20
    for years. Definietly think that that's where we are now and that =
it's not=20
    going to change in the next quarter or two, but wonder what suggests =
it will=20
    be many more years of this.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
    class=3D510423418-14042002></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D510423418-14042002>--=20
    Mona</SPAN></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C1E3B1.D9FDF3E0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Robert McGill"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Robert McGill"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Robert McGill"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.