Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?


From: Ronald 9 Davis <mrdavis9@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 01:05:09 -0500

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] FRE and FNM "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


I think there are a lot of people using canslim stocks to "swing trade" for
small profits, and so they get out after a small advance. They then keep it
on their watch list  looking for another entry for a small profit.   Ron
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "J. Lobatto" <jlobatto@nyc.rr.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?


> It looks to me that the few legit looking cup and handle type breakouts in
> the recent past have invariably shaken CANSLIMers out by retracing back
into
> their consolidation base. My suspicion is there are too many of us chasing
> too few classic looking breakouts. The only breakouts that seem to
maintain
> their push upward are non cup and handle advances....
>
> Jon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?
>
>
> > Tom:
> >
> >      Would you say that the stocks that you allude to are stocks whose
> > breakouts succeed according to CANSLIM criteria?  And, if so or not, how
> > would you distinguish these charts of stocks that breakout from ones
whose
> > break-outs are CANSLIM-legit?
> >
> >      More to the point, would you say that these breakouts from
> non-CANSLIM
> > formations are more prevalent than they were in the past?
> >
> > jans
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 4/14/2002 1:18:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:
> >
> > << ...the surveillance programs by both NASD and SEC seem to have become
a
> > joke. I see more and more stocks that trade huge volume, and make major
> price
> > swings, only to have news released hours or days later. It doesn't take
a
> > rocket scientist to see that the news was leaked early, and traded on
it,
> > before it was publicly released. Yet I don't see the regulators acting.
> >   >>
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] FRE and FNM "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.