Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Ira Post" <ip108@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:25:37 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Simon Yang Simon Yang
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] NOBL "Ira Post"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
In the few weeks I've been on this list, I found two stocks recommended by others (SGR and GISX) that I bought after researching them myself. Both are doing well. Needless to say I like the idea and will (if no one objects) post mine for others who might be interested. Ira - ----- Original Message ----- From: "William King" <wk11@adelphia.net> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian > Re list posting........ > > As newbie and noncontributor to date, I can see the rationale of the older > and more astute members of the list to not share the results of their hard > work so that others can benefit. > > However, IMHO, there would be some benefit to the overall list if the new > members became better stock investors (and subsequently contributors) based > on analyzing the posted stocks. Personally, I have learned a lot already > by researching the stocks that are discussed to see if I would buy them > based on my understanding of the CANSLIM approach. > > Bill King > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Spencer48@aol.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:32 AM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian > > > > Ian: > > > > I would add that earlier in the week, IBD ran a column (in either the > > Big Picture or Investors Corner) saying that small and mid caps were > easily > > outpacing big caps. > > > > As for your third paragraph (One of the reasons I rarely post picks > here > > is that the issues I find with the most favourable risk/reward outlook > > (IMO), have been under $15 (and many sub $10) stocks for quite some time. > I > > know that the majority of list > > readers are resolute in sticking to higher price stocks, so I try not to > > bring them up often...), I (for one) would value your picks as threshing > the > > stock-wheat from the stock-chaff. You've been in this group for some > time, > > and (in my opinion) you analytical astuteness (particularly with small > caps) > > is superlative. > > > > However, if you don't post the stocks you're interestd in, I can't > say I > > blame you. I agree with Katherine (although it may sound selfish, it > makes > > sense to me) that it's unfair that one should do all the work only for > others > > to reap the benefits. > > > > > > > > jans > > > > In a message dated 4/18/2002 12:19:42 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > > ianstm@shaw.ca writes: > > > > << Dimitri: > > > > I prefer to buy stocks in the $12-$15 range, but that is not what the > market > > is offering right now. IMHO, the original 'S' in CANSLIM overrides price > > nits. In fact, the biggest hurdle I see to a long sustained move up in > tech > > stocks is that they split way too many times in the 1998-2000 mania, > leaving > > most of them horrendously over-priced on a P/S or P/E basis above $15. (I > > have long felt that the tech bear will finally be over when many of > > yesteryears winners start doing reverse splits - LU's recent announcement > > was encouraging). > > > > Remember that when WON did his original research, the median number of > > shares outstanding was 4,000,000! I would absolutely love to have a large > > selection of $15+ stocks with solid growth, and less than 10,000,000 > shares > > outstanding. I just cannot find that many - although there are some: MTEC > > comes to mind - it is the poster child for CANSLIM IMHO, with less than > > 5,000,000 shares out. > > > > One of the reasons I rarely post picks here is that the issues I find > with > > the most favourable risk/reward outlook (IMO), have been under $15 (and > many > > sub $10) stocks for quite some time. I know that the majority of list > > readers are resolute in sticking to higher price stocks, so I try not to > > bring them up often (someone explicitly asked me about MRGE today - so I > > posted my position). > > > > I do not like being pedantic - I like to make money. I use all the > letters > > in CANSLIM, giving 'S" far more weight than most people, but I don't > worry > > too much about the 'extra' WON criteria like price and volume. > > > > Ian >> > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Simon Yang Simon Yang
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] NOBL "Ira Post"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]