Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........

From: "Ira Post" <ip108@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:25:37 -0400
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian - MRGE AlpineTap34@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
In the few weeks I've been on this list, I found two stocks recommended by
others (SGR and GISX) that I bought after researching them myself.  Both are
doing well.  Needless to say I like the idea and will (if no one objects)
post mine for others who might be interested.

Ira
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "William King" <wk11@adelphia.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian


> Re list posting........
>
> As newbie and noncontributor to date, I can see the rationale of the older
> and more astute members of the list to not share the results of their hard
> work so that others can benefit.
>
> However, IMHO, there would be some benefit to the overall list if the new
> members became better stock investors (and subsequently contributors)
based
> on analyzing the posted stocks. Personally, I have learned a lot  already
> by researching  the stocks that are discussed to see if I would buy them
> based on my understanding of  the CANSLIM approach.
>
> Bill King
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian
>
>
> > Ian:
> >
> >      I would add that earlier in the week, IBD ran a column (in either
the
> > Big Picture or Investors Corner) saying that small and mid caps were
> easily
> > outpacing big caps.
> >
> >      As for your third paragraph (One of the reasons I rarely post picks
> here
> > is that the issues I find with  the most favourable risk/reward outlook
> > (IMO), have been under $15 (and many  sub $10) stocks for quite some
time.
> I
> > know that the majority of list
> >  readers are resolute in sticking to higher price stocks, so I try not
to
> >  bring them up often...), I (for one) would value your picks as
threshing
> the
> > stock-wheat from the stock-chaff.  You've been in this group for some
> time,
> > and (in my opinion) you analytical astuteness (particularly with small
> caps)
> > is superlative.
> >
> >      However, if you don't post the stocks you're interestd in, I can't
> say I
> > blame you.  I agree with Katherine (although it may sound selfish, it
> makes
> > sense to me) that it's unfair that one should do all the work only for
> others
> > to reap the benefits.
> >
> >
> >
> > jans
> >
> > In a message dated 4/18/2002 12:19:42 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > ianstm@shaw.ca writes:
> >
> > << Dimitri:
> >
> >  I prefer to buy stocks in the $12-$15 range, but that is not what the
> market
> >  is offering right now. IMHO, the original 'S' in CANSLIM overrides
price
> >  nits. In fact, the biggest hurdle I see to a long sustained move up in
> tech
> >  stocks is that they split way too many times in the 1998-2000 mania,
> leaving
> >  most of them horrendously over-priced on a P/S or P/E basis above $15.
(I
> >  have long felt that the tech bear will finally be over when many of
> >  yesteryears winners start doing reverse splits - LU's recent
announcement
> >  was encouraging).
> >
> >  Remember that when WON did his original research, the median number of
> >  shares outstanding was 4,000,000! I would absolutely love to have a
large
> >  selection of $15+ stocks with solid growth, and less than 10,000,000
> shares
> >  outstanding. I just cannot find that many - although there are some:
MTEC
> >  comes to mind - it is the poster child for CANSLIM IMHO, with less than
> >  5,000,000 shares out.
> >
> >  One of the reasons I rarely post picks here is that the issues I find
> with
> >  the most favourable risk/reward outlook (IMO), have been under $15 (and
> many
> >  sub $10) stocks for quite some time. I know that the majority of list
> >  readers are resolute in sticking to higher price stocks, so I try not
to
> >  bring them up often (someone explicitly asked me about MRGE today - so
I
> >  posted my position).
> >
> >  I do not like being pedantic - I like to make money. I use all the
> letters
> >  in CANSLIM, giving 'S" far more weight than most people, but I don't
> worry
> >  too much about the 'extra' WON criteria like price and volume.
> >
> >  Ian >>
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.