Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........

From: "Ira Post" <ip108@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 05:16:29 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........ "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........ Vanchee1@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........ "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
Jon, I'll do my best on this.  It's rated B+ on the IBD website with ratings
of 98, 57, A, A and B+ for the five Corporate Ratings - so the RS rating is
weak - but the others are very strong.  Technically, I have to admit there's
nothing there that I could begin to call a cup and handle, but it has
recently crossed all it's significant moving averages going up.

Ira

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "J. Lobatto" <jlobatto@nyc.rr.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........


> Ira,
>
> Since I'm new to the list myself, I wasn't around for any discussion on
SGR.
> I took a look at it and although the EPS rating is a strong 98, the RS
> rating is 58. I can't figure out how this was a CANSLIM pick. Am I missing
> something. (PS- congrats on the profit)
>
> Jon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ira Post" <ip108@yahoo.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Re list posting........
>
>
> > In the few weeks I've been on this list, I found two stocks recommended
by
> > others (SGR and GISX) that I bought after researching them myself.  Both
> are
> > doing well.  Needless to say I like the idea and will (if no one
objects)
> > post mine for others who might be interested.
> >
> > Ira
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William King" <wk11@adelphia.net>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian
> >
> >
> > > Re list posting........
> > >
> > > As newbie and noncontributor to date, I can see the rationale of the
> older
> > > and more astute members of the list to not share the results of their
> hard
> > > work so that others can benefit.
> > >
> > > However, IMHO, there would be some benefit to the overall list if the
> new
> > > members became better stock investors (and subsequently contributors)
> > based
> > > on analyzing the posted stocks. Personally, I have learned a lot
> already
> > > by researching  the stocks that are discussed to see if I would buy
them
> > > based on my understanding of  the CANSLIM approach.
> > >
> > > Bill King
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Spencer48@aol.com>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:32 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Tom or Ian
> > >
> > >
> > > > Ian:
> > > >
> > > >      I would add that earlier in the week, IBD ran a column (in
either
> > the
> > > > Big Picture or Investors Corner) saying that small and mid caps were
> > > easily
> > > > outpacing big caps.
> > > >
> > > >      As for your third paragraph (One of the reasons I rarely post
> picks
> > > here
> > > > is that the issues I find with  the most favourable risk/reward
> outlook
> > > > (IMO), have been under $15 (and many  sub $10) stocks for quite some
> > time.
> > > I
> > > > know that the majority of list
> > > >  readers are resolute in sticking to higher price stocks, so I try
not
> > to
> > > >  bring them up often...), I (for one) would value your picks as
> > threshing
> > > the
> > > > stock-wheat from the stock-chaff.  You've been in this group for
some
> > > time,
> > > > and (in my opinion) you analytical astuteness (particularly with
small
> > > caps)
> > > > is superlative.
> > > >
> > > >      However, if you don't post the stocks you're interestd in, I
> can't
> > > say I
> > > > blame you.  I agree with Katherine (although it may sound selfish,
it
> > > makes
> > > > sense to me) that it's unfair that one should do all the work only
for
> > > others
> > > > to reap the benefits.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > jans
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 4/18/2002 12:19:42 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > > > ianstm@shaw.ca writes:
> > > >
> > > > << Dimitri:
> > > >
> > > >  I prefer to buy stocks in the $12-$15 range, but that is not what
the
> > > market
> > > >  is offering right now. IMHO, the original 'S' in CANSLIM overrides
> > price
> > > >  nits. In fact, the biggest hurdle I see to a long sustained move up
> in
> > > tech
> > > >  stocks is that they split way too many times in the 1998-2000
mania,
> > > leaving
> > > >  most of them horrendously over-priced on a P/S or P/E basis above
> $15.
> > (I
> > > >  have long felt that the tech bear will finally be over when many of
> > > >  yesteryears winners start doing reverse splits - LU's recent
> > announcement
> > > >  was encouraging).
> > > >
> > > >  Remember that when WON did his original research, the median number
> of
> > > >  shares outstanding was 4,000,000! I would absolutely love to have a
> > large
> > > >  selection of $15+ stocks with solid growth, and less than
10,000,000
> > > shares
> > > >  outstanding. I just cannot find that many - although there are
some:
> > MTEC
> > > >  comes to mind - it is the poster child for CANSLIM IMHO, with less
> than
> > > >  5,000,000 shares out.
> > > >
> > > >  One of the reasons I rarely post picks here is that the issues I
find
> > > with
> > > >  the most favourable risk/reward outlook (IMO), have been under $15
> (and
> > > many
> > > >  sub $10) stocks for quite some time. I know that the majority of
list
> > > >  readers are resolute in sticking to higher price stocks, so I try
not
> > to
> > > >  bring them up often (someone explicitly asked me about MRGE today -
> so
> > I
> > > >  posted my position).
> > > >
> > > >  I do not like being pedantic - I like to make money. I use all the
> > > letters
> > > >  in CANSLIM, giving 'S" far more weight than most people, but I
don't
> > > worry
> > > >  too much about the 'extra' WON criteria like price and volume.
> > > >
> > > >  Ian >>
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.