Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership


From: "Ira Post" <ip108@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:57:15 -0400

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Ira Post"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C1E81F.75532CE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think you got that information from Yahoo.  If you go to the IBD site =
and do a stock check-up, you'll find an Accumulation/Distribution =
(Acc/Dis) Rating of B-.  I think the discrepancy has to do with IBD's =
more recent monitoring of this information and their taking into account =
of more recent institutional buying or selling.

WON feels this is very important.  However, IBD's stock check-up gives =
this stock an overall rating of A+.  So I wouldn't worry about it the B- =
in this area.  The significance lies in the fact that institutions =
control large blocks of money and when they move into or out of a stock =
it influences the price significantly.

Ira
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Matt & Alicia Leverette=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership


  Hi,

  I have been considering ANSS.  It is rated a 98 on IBD Stock Checkup =
and it's chart looks pretty good to me.  Also, I have noticed other =
stocks within it's group have been doing well of late.

  My question has to do with Institutional Ownership.  ANSS is at 81% =
(89% of Float).  I know this is high, but how important of a factor is =
this.

  I would love some thoughts.

  Matt

- ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C1E81F.75532CE0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think you got that information from =
Yahoo.&nbsp;=20
If you go to the IBD site and do a stock check-up, you'll find an <FONT=20
size=3D3>Accumulation/Distribution (Acc/Dis) Rating of B-.&nbsp; I think =
the=20
discrepancy has to do with IBD's more recent monitoring of this =
information and=20
their taking into account of more recent institutional buying or=20
selling.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>WON feels this is very important.&nbsp; However, =
IBD's=20
stock check-up gives this stock an overall&nbsp;rating of A+.&nbsp; So I =

wouldn't worry about it the B- in this area.&nbsp; The significance lies =
in the=20
fact that institutions control large blocks of money and when they move =
into or=20
out of a stock it influences the price significantly.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Ira</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dmalever@bellsouth.net =
href=3D"mailto:malever@bellsouth.net">Matt &amp;=20
  Alicia Leverette</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, April 19, 2002 =
9:35=20
PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] =
Institutional=20
  Ownership</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have been considering ANSS.&nbsp; =
It is rated a=20
  98 on IBD Stock Checkup and it's chart looks pretty good to me.&nbsp; =
Also, I=20
  have noticed other stocks within it's group have been doing well of=20
  late.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>My question has to do with =
Institutional=20
  Ownership.&nbsp; ANSS is at 81% (89% of Float).&nbsp; I know this is =
high, but=20
  how important of a factor is this.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I would love some =
thoughts.</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>Matt</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C1E81F.75532CE0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Ira Post"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.