From: "Ira Post" <ip108@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:57:15 -0400
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Yahoo spam: "Robert Gammon"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C1E81F.75532CE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think you got that information from Yahoo. If you go to the IBD site = and do a stock check-up, you'll find an Accumulation/Distribution = (Acc/Dis) Rating of B-. I think the discrepancy has to do with IBD's = more recent monitoring of this information and their taking into account = of more recent institutional buying or selling. WON feels this is very important. However, IBD's stock check-up gives = this stock an overall rating of A+. So I wouldn't worry about it the B- = in this area. The significance lies in the fact that institutions = control large blocks of money and when they move into or out of a stock = it influences the price significantly. Ira ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Matt & Alicia Leverette=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Hi, I have been considering ANSS. It is rated a 98 on IBD Stock Checkup = and it's chart looks pretty good to me. Also, I have noticed other = stocks within it's group have been doing well of late. My question has to do with Institutional Ownership. ANSS is at 81% = (89% of Float). I know this is high, but how important of a factor is = this. I would love some thoughts. Matt - ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C1E81F.75532CE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think you got that information from = Yahoo. =20 If you go to the IBD site and do a stock check-up, you'll find an <FONT=20 size=3D3>Accumulation/Distribution (Acc/Dis) Rating of B-. I think = the=20 discrepancy has to do with IBD's more recent monitoring of this = information and=20 their taking into account of more recent institutional buying or=20 selling.</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>WON feels this is very important. However, = IBD's=20 stock check-up gives this stock an overall rating of A+. So I = wouldn't worry about it the B- in this area. The significance lies = in the=20 fact that institutions control large blocks of money and when they move = into or=20 out of a stock it influences the price significantly.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Ira</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dmalever@bellsouth.net = href=3D"mailto:malever@bellsouth.net">Matt &=20 Alicia Leverette</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, April 19, 2002 = 9:35=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] = Institutional=20 Ownership</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have been considering ANSS. = It is rated a=20 98 on IBD Stock Checkup and it's chart looks pretty good to me. = Also, I=20 have noticed other stocks within it's group have been doing well of=20 late.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>My question has to do with = Institutional=20 Ownership. ANSS is at 81% (89% of Float). I know this is = high, but=20 how important of a factor is this.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I would love some = thoughts.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial = size=3D2>Matt</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C1E81F.75532CE0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Yahoo spam: "Robert Gammon"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]