From: Warren Keuffel <wkeuffel@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:37:10 -0600
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool Warren Keuffel
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool Warren Keuffel
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi, Ira. Yes, you can do 3 year screens on earnings. As for debt, I guess it depends on the industry, but I am not comfortable with companies without a cushion to help them get thru difficult times. Regarding market cap, my understanding is that it is *much* harder for a big cap to have an explosive growth spurt simply because of the inertia of the shares already out there. All that said, however, with the screen, I can see who survives the screen with and without the debt, cap, etc. filters. Warren Ira Post wrote: >I'm always interested in new screening tools (or old ones I don't know >about). Some questions/comments. > >1) Can you do three year earnings instead of 5 with this screen? >2) While debt/equity is a good thing to evaluate, some companies with high >debt are good buys. But high debt is a red light that should be looked at. >3) I'm not big on looking at market capitalization. The reason low market >cap stocks often do better is because their may be more of those stocks that >are a good value and haven't gotten onto many peoples radar. I prefer to >look at the company and its fundamentals regardless of market cap. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Warren Keuffel" <wkeuffel@xmission.com> >To: "CANSLIM list" <canslim@lists.xmission.com> >Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 2:08 PM >Subject: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool > > >>Hey, I signed up for a two week free trial of a financial site run by >>Smart Money. Looking through HTMMIS I created a screen with these >>CANSLIM parameters: >> >>A -- 5 Yr earnings growth % >= 25% >>C -- Quarterly earnings % (compared to same qtr previous year) >= 25% >>I -- Institutional ownership < 40% >>S -- Market Cap < $200M >>S -- Debt as % of total cap < 50% >> >>It gave me back 10 stocks >> >>EMBX >>CNTL >>VLGEA >>FRS >>XNR >>HITK >>PMFG >>HANS >>TRAK >>TOF >> >>I have not looked at the charts for these bad boys, or done any further >>DD, but I am curious what comments you might have about (a) screening in >>this manner; (b) the screening parameters (numbers) I used; and (c) >>which, if any, parameters would you drop, add or change. >> >>Obviously these parameters are very tight but I did that deliberately so >>as to create a hit list of manageable size for this message. For a >>real-world exercise I would loosen the parameters somewhat and conduct >>more DD. >> >>Warren >> >> >>- >>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. >> > > >- >-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" >-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or >-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool Warren Keuffel
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool Warren Keuffel
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]