Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:42:00 -0400
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool Warren Keuffel
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0CFE_01C1E98E.21F5F6C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Matt, DGO shows this as having only 7% ownership by management (a = negative) and 30% by mutual funds (also a negative, too high). ADV is = over 155K, so there is liquidity, and would make me doubt the = institutional ownership you got. I do note a earnings forecast for this year of only 3%, and 12% next = year. That would knock it off any consideration for me. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Matt & Alicia Leverette=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Hi, I have been considering ANSS. It is rated a 98 on IBD Stock Checkup and = it's chart looks pretty good to me. Also, I have noticed other stocks = within it's group have been doing well of late. My question has to do with Institutional Ownership. ANSS is at 81% (89% = of Float). I know this is high, but how important of a factor is this. I would love some thoughts. Matt - ------=_NextPart_000_0CFE_01C1E98E.21F5F6C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Matt, DGO shows this as having only 7% ownership = by=20 management (a negative) and 30% by mutual funds (also a negative, too = high). ADV=20 is over 155K, so there is liquidity, and would make me doubt the = institutional=20 ownership you got.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I do note a earnings forecast for this year of = only 3%,=20 and 12% next year. That would knock it off any consideration for=20 me.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20 TexWorley</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3Dmalever@bellsouth.net href=3D"mailto:malever@bellsouth.net">Matt = &=20 Alicia Leverette</A> </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Friday, April 19, 2002 9:35 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have been considering ANSS. It = is rated a=20 98 on IBD Stock Checkup and it's chart looks pretty good to me. = Also, I=20 have noticed other stocks within it's group have been doing well of=20 late.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>My question has to do with = Institutional=20 Ownership. ANSS is at 81% (89% of Float). I know this is = high, but=20 how important of a factor is this.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I would love some = thoughts.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Matt</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0CFE_01C1E98E.21F5F6C0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool Warren Keuffel
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Testing Smart Money Screening Tool "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]