From: "Tim Fisher" <Tim@orerockon.com>
Subject: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast)
Date: 23 Apr 2002 09:47:01 -0700
Next Article (by Date): Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "david frank"
Top of Thread: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "david frank"
Next in Thread: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "david frank"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Bingo. Some have tried tracking indexes in HGS and they seem to work real well; dbphoenix, who now posts on the Motley Fool Canslim board, comes to mind. For me they would be much more valuable than generic M indexes, save the INDI 500 ^NDI to indicate market direction for CANSLIM trading. At 09:45 AM 4/23/2002 -0700, you wrote: >"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o = >"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w = >"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1 = >"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"> >I can't help thinking that we are in the period that represents "The Great >CANSLIM Contradiction": > >1. M must be rising >2. We must be only buying stocks with strongly rising revenues and EPS >3. We shouldn't be buying 'yesteryears winners', whose revenues and EPS >are declining >4. The indexes are made up of '3' >5. 'M' is defined as '4', the indexes > >Ian > Tim Fisher Ore-ROCK-On Rockhounding Web Site Owner, Fisher Fisheries, Ltd. mailto:tim@OreRockOn.com WWW http://OreRockOn.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "david frank"
Top of Thread: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "david frank"
Next in Thread: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "david frank"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]