From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:46:00 -0600
Next Article (by Author): Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "Patrick Wahl"
Next in Thread: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I don't know if they ever qualified as market leaders, but stocks in the medical sector, such as HMO stocks (USHC, UNH, PHSY) were some real stars for a while, and medical instruments (STJM, MDT) is another sector that typically has strong performance, drug stocks another part of the overall medical area that usually has performed well (kinda weak now though). On 23 Apr 2002 at 21:26, Tom Worley wrote: > I don't know that I agree with you on this, Katherine. In the past 4 decades > or so, the best markets I have seen were all led by some form of technology > stocks, with financial stocks as the secondary support during corrections > and taking over brief leadership. Maybe that's my "rose tinted glasses" - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "Patrick Wahl"
Next in Thread: Re: "M" (was Re: [CANSLIM] S&P 500 forecast) "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]