From: Ian <ianstm@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally?
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:19:22 -0700
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? Vanchee1@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Mona Guarino"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? Vanchee1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
"it also removes the added burden of modifying the rules to fit the small and micro cap entry and exit strategies to reflect the volatility of these groups" Bill: In my experience, there is absolutely no need to modify these rules for microcaps. Almost all of my big gains have come from buying at precise trigger points (C&H or flatline bases) where a surge in volume was occuring. The only major difference that I see is that the time spent in the buy window is much smaller. When I buy in the base, my overall results are just as lousy as if I bought in the base of a mega-cap. Sell rules are identical - distribution days, blowoff tops, stops etc ... The only thing I would never do is set a trailing 7% stop from a recent peak early in a breakout - but I don't think that is wise with any stock. And I still say that WON only changed his 'S' criteria while we were in a bubble - it will probably revert back to the historical norm now, and require successful CANSLIMers to care a lot about 'S'. We'll see. Ian - ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Triffet <btriffet@earthlink.net> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:37 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? > Mona, > > This is very interesting to me. It confirms that there is and has been a > "stealth" rally for some time in the small and micro caps. Because these are > not represented well in the three major indexes, they continue to perform > under the general investors radar screen. > > I think those that paid more attention to sector performance have done very > well to date. Those (like me) who glued their eyes to the major indexes > (pure canslim) missed out. I think WON's approach is to just invest in the > main market uptrends. While it may not be as successful in this market and > keeps one in cash - it also removes the added burden of modifying the rules > to fit the small and micro cap entry and exit strategies to reflect the > volatility of these groups. Some of these have been discussed here such as > buying in the base and keeping a watch throughout the trading day. > > Perhaps a mixture of Ian Woodward's sector influenced type trading (see > www.highgrowthstock.com ) with canslim rules is the way to go for some? I > know it's worked for others here. > > -Bill Triffet > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mona Guarino" <webmaster@design21.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:42 AM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? > > > > MessageDuke, > > > > I am relatively new to CanSlim and still trying to make sense of the whole > > puzzle, but in the notes I believe you posted a day or so ago, under the > > section 'The Market,' item #2 it says '[t]he best indicator of market > > direction is how your stocks are doing; if you're stopped out of 2 or 3, > > that's a good sign the market's ailing.' I can't identify an exact WON > > reference at this hour of the night, but I remember reading similar > language > > elsewhere, but it's comments like that that let me think it is possible > > (though riskier) to make money even in THIS market. Until Invision tanked > > this afternoon, I was up over 3.5% most of the day when the major indices > > were down all day. And, despite Invision, still I ended up for the day. I > > won't argue that the Market (emphasis on capital M) is in an uptrend, but > as > > long as I can regularly beat the indices and prior experience, I'll take > my > > chances. > > > > -- Mona > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Duke Miller > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:02 PM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? > > > > > > Katherine, et al: > > > > How can any CANSLIMer think the market is in an uptrend? > > > > From tonight's WSJ: > > > > The Nasdaq fell 1% to 1713.34, its lowest level in nearly six months, on > > lackluster earnings. The Dow industrials sagged 58.81 points to 10030.43, > > the lowest level in more than two months. > > > > I'm amazed (read: amused). > > > > Duke > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:41 PM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? > > > > > > Youch.... is that one you've been in for a while? Gotta hurt....Too > many > > that look the same over the last few days....CACI, POSS, MIMS, RMCI, JDAS, > > etc. I've been keeping tabs on them and capturing the charts to review > > later. Certainly a "pull the rug from under your feet kind of market." In > a > > way, may be a good thing....more likely to weigh on the sentiment numbers > > (have stayed too bullish lately). > > > > Katherine > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Tom Worley > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:58 PM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? > > > > > > After what OVRL did to me (down 27% for the day), I am ready to try > > grocery stores, hell people will still have to eat, I guess. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? Vanchee1@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? "Mona Guarino"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Bear Rally? Vanchee1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]