From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RMCI (was Re: [CANSLIM] TASR)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 07:41:08 -0400
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] TOM.....ERES "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] TASR "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
"M" is particularly emotional right now. Stocks like RMCI, and EPIQ, are being excessively influenced by the perception of an improving economy, and its impact on their future level of growth. If they continue to deliver great fundies in the future, they likely will eventually be rewarded. But in the meantime, expectations are rapidly changing, and mostly for the negative, and will take time to overcome. Ultimately, expectations is the driving force for price change. And it's subject to rapid change according to human psychology. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] TASR Whoever asked about breakouts and why at least some people recommended against buying them, there is a good example. RMCI's psychotic behaviour this week is another example. > > Any reason for TASR to be taking this big hit today? > > > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] TOM.....ERES "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] TASR "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]