Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Article For Taser International, Inc (TASR)
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:14:56 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Check out LionShares.com [TASR] Mhboatman@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers Robert
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0737_01C1EEF9.BF0A8690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Howard,=20 As a military trained firearms expert (handgun, M16, and firearms = instructor/range safety officer), as well as having considerable flight = time in the cockpit, I would be opposed to firearns on a plane, = anywhere, and especially in the cockpit. For me, the taser simply makes = good sense, you can train a lot of people on it without requiring the = level of training needed for use of a firearm. Handguns on a pilot were = for use after you were on the ground, and that's where they belong. It is so logical that the FAA will have to approve use of non lethal = weapons that I presume it is already factored into the stock's price. = DGO still shows the forecast at 34 cents this year, a double in = earnings, while the company is publicly indicating 50 cents, a triple. = Company forecasts likely to be more accurate, and include sales to = airlines. One aspect I am investigating is the likelihood of FAA approval for = tasers in the passenger cabins. Should this happen, and there be enough = interest, it could double to triple the size of orders from airlines. The recent news that the Marine Corps is paying them to research = advanced technology for use in military applications is likely far more = significant, since I doubt any military sales are factored into any = analyst's forecasts. Likewise, sales to the retail community are not = likely to be factored in, so success of recent efforts there will make a = difference as well. I separately posted the quote where they mentioned FAA approval, and = have also emailed them for clarification. Will post any reply I get. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Mhboatman@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 8:55 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Article For Taser International, Inc (TASR) Tom,=20 You are right -- that link was wrong. I tried it again and got the same = result!!!!???=20 Any way I cut and pasted it into word -- see if this reads better?=20 I had not heard that the FAA had already approved its use on airlines. = I would be very surprised if that was true. I check their web site -- = not a word about FAA action. Also, no news releases found on my = sources. It should/would be a worthy news story. =20 I do expect FAA approval of TASR -- as opposed to the FAA authorizing = hand guns in the cockpit which I do not see happening any time soon. = How much affect will FAA approval have on the stock short term? Is FAA = approval already priced in (sell on news situation)?=20 Howard=20 - ------=_NextPart_000_0737_01C1EEF9.BF0A8690 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Howard, </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>As a military trained firearms expert (handgun, = M16, and=20 firearms instructor/range safety officer), as well as having = considerable flight=20 time in the cockpit, I would be opposed to firearns on a plane, = anywhere, and=20 especially in the cockpit. For me, the taser simply makes good sense, = you can=20 train a lot of people on it without requiring the level of training = needed for=20 use of a firearm. Handguns on a pilot were for use after you were on the = ground,=20 and that's where they belong.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>It is so logical that the FAA will have to = approve use of=20 non lethal weapons that I presume it is already factored into the = stock's price.=20 DGO still shows the forecast at 34 cents this year, a double in = earnings, while=20 the company is publicly indicating 50 cents, a triple. Company forecasts = likely=20 to be more accurate, and include sales to airlines.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>One aspect I am investigating is the likelihood = of FAA=20 approval for tasers in the passenger cabins. Should this happen, and = there be=20 enough interest, it could double to triple the size of orders from=20 airlines.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>The recent news that the Marine Corps is paying = them to=20 research advanced technology for use in military applications is likely = far more=20 significant, since I doubt any military sales are factored into any = analyst's=20 forecasts. Likewise, sales to the retail community are not likely to be = factored=20 in, so success of recent efforts there will make a difference as=20 well.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I separately posted the quote where they = mentioned FAA=20 approval, and have also emailed them for clarification. Will post any = reply I=20 get.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20 TexWorley</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3DMhboatman@aol.com = href=3D"mailto:Mhboatman@aol.com">Mhboatman@aol.com</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, April 28, 2002 8:55 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Article For Taser International, Inc=20 (TASR)</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>Tom, = <BR><BR>You are=20 right -- that link was wrong. I tried it again and got the same=20 result!!!!??? <BR>Any way I cut and pasted it into word -- see if this = reads=20 better? <BR><BR>I had not heard that the FAA had already approved its = use on=20 airlines. I would be very surprised if that was true. I = check their=20 web site -- not a word about FAA action. Also, no news releases = found on=20 my sources. It should/would be a worthy news story. = <BR><BR>I do=20 expect FAA approval of TASR -- as opposed to the FAA authorizing hand = guns in=20 the cockpit which I do not see happening any time soon. How much = affect=20 will FAA approval have on the stock short term? Is FAA approval = already=20 priced in (sell on news situation)? <BR><BR>Howard<I>=20 <BR></I></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0737_01C1EEF9.BF0A8690-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Check out LionShares.com [TASR] Mhboatman@aol.com
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Acc/Dis Numbers Robert
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]