Re: [CANSLIM] Earnings

From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Earnings
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:43:41 -0400
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Earnings DanC
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Earnings "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Earnings "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Earnings DanC
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
GDP for the Q1 was up for a variety of reasons, one of which was that
consumer sales remained strong, but a second, and more significant one, was
that inventory reductions slowed appreciably.

Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Richards" <adrich@gte.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Earnings


Tom,

I know that you want this to get better . . . but sometimes we have to face
facts.

From the King report of 4/29/2002.

GDP came in higher than expected because the deflator, which was expected to
be 1.5%, came in at only 0.8%.  Fooling with the deflator (and CPI) to
overstate GDP and understate inflation is a government staple.  The market
ignored the ridiculous government misrepresentation.


FFR

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Tom Worley
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:57 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Earnings


I disagree, Fred, everyone expects lousy year over year comparisons. The
market is driven by expectorations, not past history, and right now the
market wants to know that things will get better in the future.

Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Richards" <adrich@gte.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:44 AM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Earnings


One of the reasons so many S&P 500 companies have beaten their earning
estimates is that they reduced them significantly in recent months.  The
real criteria is how are they performing versus the previous quarter last
year.

Fred

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ian
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:04 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Earnings


Hi all:

I thought I would weigh in with one observation that arises from my personal
methodology: I start all of my daily mining by going through all the 'Ups'
earnings reports in IBD. I list the companies with strong revenue and EPS
growth in a little notebook of mine - filtering out most cyclicals, extreme
high historical valuations, and unusually low RS. For the last few quarters,
I have seen fairly slim picking. But in the last 2 weeks, the number of
entries in my book has swelled in comparison to both Q4 2001 and Q1 2001.

I also note that a full 80%+ of S&P 500 companies have beaten earnings
estimates this Q.

I have no idea what this will mean for either the mega-cap indexes , or the
micro/smallcaps that tend to inhabit my universe - but it tells me that
earnings, if not 'M', are unequivocally on the upswing.

As an off-topic aside, several years ago I read an interview with a
successful investor who has been in the US equity markets for decades. He
made the comment that he now times economic cycles based on the earnings of
EK - when Kodak's earnings start to tick up, then the economy is on the
upswing. I don't know if it is still relevant in the age of digital
photography, but I did find myself making a mental note last week when EK
came out with their pronouncement that Q1 2002 was their EPS bottom.


Finally, my universe of stocks finally took a hit Wed-Fri last week, (not
enough to lose all of the big gains of Mon-Tues, but it was the first sign
of panic selling since early February). I did end up lightening up a lot of
positions and raising cash - as it appears that even some of the strong
smallcaps are starting to be sucked into the selling.


Ian




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.