From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:10:57 -0600
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG Ian
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG Harvey Brion
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I get the idea that QP gives a bit more weight to recent quarters. I followed the EPS ranking in IBD on Broadcom when it was just getting going, turning in 100% growth per quarter, and the EPS rank in IBD would not budge out of the seventies, I think because there is some sort of cap on the EPS rank for a stock with a short earnings history. On 30 Apr 2002 at 15:23, J. Lobatto wrote: > I checked the RS number on Quotes Plus and it is 86! It's strange... usually > the Quotes Plus (QRS) and IBD's RS track each other fairly closely. This is > one of those cases where they're wildly different. I don't know the exact > formula for either number, but they obviously are weighting things > differently or using different time frames. > > Jon - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG Ian
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG Harvey Brion
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PMFG "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]