From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Homebuilders- fundamentals
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 10:15:07 -0400
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] USLB "John Solarno"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Homebuilders- fundamentals Eric Jaenike
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Homebuilders- fundamentals Eric Jaenike
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C1F1C2.3C123460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric, We have talked about the perception of a "bubble" in the home builders = group for close to six months, and so far has not happened to get popped = yet. Doesn't mean it won't. But some contrary thoughts.=20 Low interest rates are still driving this industry Last year was a record, so hard to sustain or compare to Until recently, most economists believed the Feds would start raising = rates at the May meeting, now that is out the window, and even a hike at = the June meeting is unlikely (first hike will inspire people to close on = a mortgage deal, after which everything slows). Even after a few rate hikes, rates will still be below historic levels Unemployment, even when not felt personally, affects everyone to some = degree. It is a lagging indicator, and likely will rise further before = beginning to drop. Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Eric Jaenike=20 To: canslim group=20 Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:07 AM Subject: [CANSLIM] Homebuilders- fundamentals For those following the homebuilders, note that KB Home just reported a = 13.2% drop in April US orders. Of interest also is the recent insider = selling. Other data points: taking a 3 month average (Jan-March), new starts = slowed at a 20% annual rate. Existing home sales fell 8.6% (reported = 4/25), and the inventory of new homes rose to 4.8 months (also reported = 4/25). Housing demand is seen slowing by the Nat'l Assoc. of Home = Builders, who see housing starts rising 1.7% this year and falling 2.9% = next year. They anticipate single family starts rising 2.4% in '02 and = falling 3.6% next year. Single family sales are seen dropping 0.7% this = year. These stocks have generally surpassed their peak historic multiples. = They are also closely inversely correlated with interest rates. I = believe the weakness in mid-March came on a small spike in the 10 yrs = yield (can someone confirm this?). Of course, the counter argument is = that they are market share gainers, have tighter inventory and cost = controls than previously, they don't build as much on spec, etc. and = thus deserve higher peak cycle multiples. I am skeptical of the group, but have no positions either long or short. = I would be inclined to short them if they got toppy, but I think its too = early to enter right now. Re: CCRN adv, the secondary on 3/21 created a spike in trading volume to = 8.1 million shares, or approx 15x current adv (and 40x that times adv). = If we assume an average day's volume on 3/21, the current adv drops to = 350k, making yesterdays volume 87% above average. Of course, that = doesn't impact ROE, which is low, and M, which is dicey. Eric - -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - ------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness - ------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C1F1C2.3C123460 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Hi Eric,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>We have talked about the perception of a = "bubble" in the=20 home builders group for close to six months, and so far has not happened = to get=20 popped yet. Doesn't mean it won't. But some contrary thoughts. = </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Low interest rates are still driving this=20 industry</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Last year was a record, so hard to sustain or = compare=20 to</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Until recently, most economists believed the = Feds would=20 start raising rates at the May meeting, now that is out the window, and = even a=20 hike at the June meeting is unlikely (first hike will inspire people to = close on=20 a mortgage deal, after which everything slows).</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Even after a few rate hikes, rates will still be = below=20 historic levels</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Unemployment, even when not felt personally, = affects=20 everyone to some degree. It is a lagging indicator, and likely will rise = further=20 before beginning to drop.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20 TexWorley</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3Dericjaenike@yahoo.com href=3D"mailto:ericjaenike@yahoo.com">Eric = Jaenike</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim group</A> </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:07 AM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] Homebuilders- fundamentals</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <P>For those following the homebuilders, note that KB Home just reported = a 13.2%=20 drop in April US orders. Of interest also is the recent insider = selling.</P> <P>Other data points: taking a 3 month average (Jan-March), new starts = slowed at=20 a 20% annual rate. Existing home sales fell 8.6% (reported 4/25), and = the=20 inventory of new homes rose to 4.8 months (also reported 4/25). Housing = demand=20 is seen slowing by the Nat'l Assoc. of Home Builders, who see housing = starts=20 rising 1.7% this year and falling 2.9% next year. They anticipate single = family=20 starts rising 2.4% in '02 and falling 3.6% next year. Single family = sales are=20 seen dropping 0.7% this year.</P> <P>These stocks have generally surpassed their peak historic multiples. = They are=20 also closely inversely correlated with interest rates. I believe the = weakness in=20 mid-March came on a small spike in the 10 yrs yield (can someone confirm = this?).=20 Of course, the counter argument is that they are market share gainers, = have=20 tighter inventory and cost controls than previously, they don't build as = much on=20 spec, etc. and thus deserve higher peak cycle multiples.</P> <P>I am skeptical of the group, but have no positions either long or = short. I=20 would be inclined to short them if they got toppy, but I think its too = early to=20 enter right now.</P> <P>Re: CCRN adv, the secondary on 3/21 created a spike in trading volume = to 8.1=20 million shares, or approx 15x current adv (and 40x that times adv). If = we assume=20 an average day's volume on 3/21, the current adv drops to 350k, making=20 yesterdays volume 87% above average. Of course, that doesn't impact ROE, = which=20 is low, and M, which is dicey.</P> <P>Eric</P> <P><BR> <HR SIZE=3D1> <B>Do You Yahoo!?</B><BR><A=20 href=3D"http://rd.yahoo.com/welcome/*http://health.yahoo.com">Yahoo! = Health</A> -=20 your guide to health and wellness</BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C1F1C2.3C123460-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] USLB "John Solarno"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Homebuilders- fundamentals Eric Jaenike
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Homebuilders- fundamentals Eric Jaenike
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]