Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI


From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 22:24:36 -0400

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Marty"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_00A7_01C1F228.24142C40
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tom:
On CCRN you mention that formation was poor.
Is that because the handle extended BELOW the 50% point of the cup and =
was also jagged in price?

On USPH does the 10% pullback on such ENTHUSIASTIC volume today cause a =
concern?=20
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Tom Worley=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI


  CCRN - maybe, but cup poorly formed, and now well extended from the =
handle
  USPI - yes, longer and better formed, altho I don't like the sharp =
decline in the handle. But even with today's 10% drop, still extended =
10% from the handle

  Tom Worley
  stkguru@bellsouth.net
  AIM: TexWorley
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: William King=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:38 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI


   An educational question - would you consider either of these cwh =
bases?
  Both are recent breakouts, seem to have good "fundies" except for ROE =
on both and GRS on USPI.=20

  Thanks,
  Bill King

- ------=_NextPart_000_00A7_01C1F228.24142C40
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>On CCRN you mention that formation was=20
poor.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is that because the handle extended =
BELOW the 50%=20
point of the cup and was also jagged in price?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>On USPH does the 10% pullback on such =
ENTHUSIASTIC=20
volume today cause a concern?&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom=20
  Worley</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 02, 2002 =
10:15=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN =
&amp;=20
  USPI</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>CCRN - maybe, but cup poorly formed, and now =
well=20
  extended from the handle</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>USPI - yes, longer and better formed, altho I =
don't like=20
  the sharp decline in the handle. But even with today's 10% drop, still =

  extended 10% from the handle</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
  TexWorley</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
  <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
  title=3Dwk11@adelphia.net href=3D"mailto:wk11@adelphia.net">William =
King</A>=20
</DIV>
  <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:38 PM</DIV>
  <DIV><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM]CCRN &amp; USPI</DIV></DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;An educational question - would =
you=20
  consider either of these cwh bases?</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Both&nbsp;are recent breakouts, seem =
to have good=20
  "fundies" except for ROE on both and GRS on USPI. </FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Bill =
King</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_00A7_01C1F228.24142C40--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Marty"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.