From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 22:15:00 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI "Winston Little"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] USLB "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI "Winston Little"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01B9_01C1F226.CCE6A070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable CCRN - maybe, but cup poorly formed, and now well extended from the = handle USPI - yes, longer and better formed, altho I don't like the sharp = decline in the handle. But even with today's 10% drop, still extended = 10% from the handle Tom Worley stkguru@bellsouth.net AIM: TexWorley - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: William King=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:38 PM Subject: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI An educational question - would you consider either of these cwh bases? Both are recent breakouts, seem to have good "fundies" except for ROE on = both and GRS on USPI.=20 Thanks, Bill King - ------=_NextPart_000_01B9_01C1F226.CCE6A070 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>CCRN - maybe, but cup poorly formed, and now = well extended=20 from the handle</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>USPI - yes, longer and better formed, altho I = don't like=20 the sharp decline in the handle. But even with today's 10% drop, still = extended=20 10% from the handle</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20 href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20 TexWorley</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3Dwk11@adelphia.net href=3D"mailto:wk11@adelphia.net">William = King</A> </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:38 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> An educational question - would = you consider=20 either of these cwh bases?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Both are recent breakouts, seem to = have good=20 "fundies" except for ROE on both and GRS on USPI. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Bill King</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_01B9_01C1F226.CCE6A070-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI "Winston Little"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] USLB "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM]CCRN & USPI "Winston Little"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]