Re: [CANSLIM] SAH


From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 23:04:26 -0400

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Marty"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH Ian
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH Ian
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Marty"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


what, we gotta think for ourselves now as well? Actually, I agree, at least
in part. I just hate IBD always pretending that they know it all, by using
charts already weeks or months, or years, old.

I stopped subscribing years ago because, in part, they were not teaching me
anything new about handling "TODAY'S" market. I can figure out, today, real
well what I should have done three months ago (and most likely did not do
then). That's easy, try something challenging, like staying fully invested
in today's market place. And making money at the same time.

Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian" <ianstm@shaw.ca>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH


I dunno. I think that would take away some of our advantage.

Ian


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH


> IBD has a history of featuring stocks long after they are buyable, and
> already a proven winner. We have had many discussions here about that, and
I
> suspect most members, as well as most paying subscribers, would like them
to
> feature more on current situations. Show the stocks with good c&h
formations
> right now that have fundies (fundamentals) that make them worth watching
> closely.
>
> Point out stocks that are ridiculously overextended, or have no fundies at
> all, as possible shorts
>
> Point out distribution days as they occur, both on indexes and individual
> stocks
>
> Tom Worley
> stkguru@bellsouth.net
> AIM: TexWorley
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
>
>
> Tom:
>
> My thinking had been that I was the only one wondering about the companies
> selected and somtimes repeated in feature stories a week or two later in
the
> paper.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
>
>
> > I often wonder where IBD gets its ideas for stocks to feature, would
like
> > them to affirmatively disclose if the company is also a client or has
> other
> > business relationship.
> >
> > What I see at a glance:
> > stagnant earnings (in cents) 55, 53, 51,  53
> > stagnant sales (in millions of $) 1626, 1566, 1679, 1605
> > debt of 99%, but selling this month $130 million of convertible bonds
> (which
> > may dilute the present shares)
> > funds 27%
> > chart is extended considerably
> > forecasts are strong, but look very optimistic compared to what the
> company
> > has been earning in past 8 qtrs. Add in stagnant results for past 4
qtrs,
> > and I am curious how they expect to grow 34% this year.
> >
> > Tom Worley
> > stkguru@bellsouth.net
> > AIM: TexWorley
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marty" <majorgenson@attbi.com>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:35 PM
> > Subject: [CANSLIM] SAH
> >
> >
> > Here one that IBD talked about in their Smart Investor section today.
SAH
> > which been on top (high EPS & RS) since Jan of this year. It has a 7 day
> > base with a break out today but is still %4 off it 52 week high. Would
pp
> be
> > at $38.55?
> >
> >
> >
> > Here are some main fundies:
> >
> > EPS 99
> >
> > RS       97
> >
> > ROE    17%
> >
> > Earnings 1.91            1.69            1.27            .74
> > (from barchart)
> >
> > Group fundamental rating is only at 72
> >
> > Group technical rating is at 95
> >
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> > Marty
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Marty"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH Ian
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH Ian
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Marty"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.