Re: [CANSLIM] SAH

From: "J. Lobatto" <jlobatto@nyc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 23:19:57 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: offlist--Re: [CANSLIM] Q: Accelerating growth "Mike Gibbons"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Tom Worley"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
I'll second these thoughts. It always puzzles me why in The Weekend Review
section they display graphs of stocks that are overextended.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH


> what, we gotta think for ourselves now as well? Actually, I agree, at
least
> in part. I just hate IBD always pretending that they know it all, by using
> charts already weeks or months, or years, old.
>
> I stopped subscribing years ago because, in part, they were not teaching
me
> anything new about handling "TODAY'S" market. I can figure out, today,
real
> well what I should have done three months ago (and most likely did not do
> then). That's easy, try something challenging, like staying fully invested
> in today's market place. And making money at the same time.
>
> Tom Worley
> stkguru@bellsouth.net
> AIM: TexWorley
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian" <ianstm@shaw.ca>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
>
>
> I dunno. I think that would take away some of our advantage.
>
> Ian
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
>
>
> > IBD has a history of featuring stocks long after they are buyable, and
> > already a proven winner. We have had many discussions here about that,
and
> I
> > suspect most members, as well as most paying subscribers, would like
them
> to
> > feature more on current situations. Show the stocks with good c&h
> formations
> > right now that have fundies (fundamentals) that make them worth watching
> > closely.
> >
> > Point out stocks that are ridiculously overextended, or have no fundies
at
> > all, as possible shorts
> >
> > Point out distribution days as they occur, both on indexes and
individual
> > stocks
> >
> > Tom Worley
> > stkguru@bellsouth.net
> > AIM: TexWorley
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
> >
> >
> > Tom:
> >
> > My thinking had been that I was the only one wondering about the
companies
> > selected and somtimes repeated in feature stories a week or two later in
> the
> > paper.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:54 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH
> >
> >
> > > I often wonder where IBD gets its ideas for stocks to feature, would
> like
> > > them to affirmatively disclose if the company is also a client or has
> > other
> > > business relationship.
> > >
> > > What I see at a glance:
> > > stagnant earnings (in cents) 55, 53, 51,  53
> > > stagnant sales (in millions of $) 1626, 1566, 1679, 1605
> > > debt of 99%, but selling this month $130 million of convertible bonds
> > (which
> > > may dilute the present shares)
> > > funds 27%
> > > chart is extended considerably
> > > forecasts are strong, but look very optimistic compared to what the
> > company
> > > has been earning in past 8 qtrs. Add in stagnant results for past 4
> qtrs,
> > > and I am curious how they expect to grow 34% this year.
> > >
> > > Tom Worley
> > > stkguru@bellsouth.net
> > > AIM: TexWorley
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Marty" <majorgenson@attbi.com>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:35 PM
> > > Subject: [CANSLIM] SAH
> > >
> > >
> > > Here one that IBD talked about in their Smart Investor section today.
> SAH
> > > which been on top (high EPS & RS) since Jan of this year. It has a 7
day
> > > base with a break out today but is still %4 off it 52 week high. Would
> pp
> > be
> > > at $38.55?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Here are some main fundies:
> > >
> > > EPS 99
> > >
> > > RS       97
> > >
> > > ROE    17%
> > >
> > > Earnings 1.91            1.69            1.27            .74
> > > (from barchart)
> > >
> > > Group fundamental rating is only at 72
> > >
> > > Group technical rating is at 95
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Marty
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.