Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 21:18:15 -0700
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD Dimitri Katsaros
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD "Winston Little"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
I just got done explaining to one of the members offline that the Weekend Review was a good place to start. Back in 97-99 they had more with actual bases ready to go. I found some great winners there back then (oh the good ol days). Perhaps it's out lived it's usefulness. I have noticed this year a lot more extended stocks than not are put there. I just think it's a sign of the market but they must still fill the paper with somthing... On a related note, I'm about to switch from IBD to Daily Graphs for the reasons above. While the subcription is a lot more, it's usefulness more than justifies it. I got REAL tired of reading about how Clinton was the anti-Christ with no real stock picks to show for it all. - -Bill - ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Lobatto" <jlobatto@nyc.rr.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:19 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > I'll second these thoughts. It always puzzles me why in The Weekend Review > section they display graphs of stocks that are overextended. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:04 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > what, we gotta think for ourselves now as well? Actually, I agree, at > least > > in part. I just hate IBD always pretending that they know it all, by using > > charts already weeks or months, or years, old. > > > > I stopped subscribing years ago because, in part, they were not teaching > me > > anything new about handling "TODAY'S" market. I can figure out, today, > real > > well what I should have done three months ago (and most likely did not do > > then). That's easy, try something challenging, like staying fully invested > > in today's market place. And making money at the same time. > > > > Tom Worley > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > AIM: TexWorley > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ian" <ianstm@shaw.ca> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:20 PM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > I dunno. I think that would take away some of our advantage. > > > > Ian > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:26 PM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > IBD has a history of featuring stocks long after they are buyable, and > > > already a proven winner. We have had many discussions here about that, > and > > I > > > suspect most members, as well as most paying subscribers, would like > them > > to > > > feature more on current situations. Show the stocks with good c&h > > formations > > > right now that have fundies (fundamentals) that make them worth watching > > > closely. > > > > > > Point out stocks that are ridiculously overextended, or have no fundies > at > > > all, as possible shorts > > > > > > Point out distribution days as they occur, both on indexes and > individual > > > stocks > > > > > > Tom Worley > > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > > AIM: TexWorley > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com> > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:18 PM > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > Tom: > > > > > > My thinking had been that I was the only one wondering about the > companies > > > selected and somtimes repeated in feature stories a week or two later in > > the > > > paper. > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net> > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:54 PM > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > > I often wonder where IBD gets its ideas for stocks to feature, would > > like > > > > them to affirmatively disclose if the company is also a client or has > > > other > > > > business relationship. > > > > > > > > What I see at a glance: > > > > stagnant earnings (in cents) 55, 53, 51, 53 > > > > stagnant sales (in millions of $) 1626, 1566, 1679, 1605 > > > > debt of 99%, but selling this month $130 million of convertible bonds > > > (which > > > > may dilute the present shares) > > > > funds 27% > > > > chart is extended considerably > > > > forecasts are strong, but look very optimistic compared to what the > > > company > > > > has been earning in past 8 qtrs. Add in stagnant results for past 4 > > qtrs, > > > > and I am curious how they expect to grow 34% this year. > > > > > > > > Tom Worley > > > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Marty" <majorgenson@attbi.com> > > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:35 PM > > > > Subject: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > > > > Here one that IBD talked about in their Smart Investor section today. > > SAH > > > > which been on top (high EPS & RS) since Jan of this year. It has a 7 > day > > > > base with a break out today but is still %4 off it 52 week high. Would > > pp > > > be > > > > at $38.55? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here are some main fundies: > > > > > > > > EPS 99 > > > > > > > > RS 97 > > > > > > > > ROE 17% > > > > > > > > Earnings 1.91 1.69 1.27 .74 > > > > (from barchart) > > > > > > > > Group fundamental rating is only at 72 > > > > > > > > Group technical rating is at 95 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marty > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD Dimitri Katsaros
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD "Winston Little"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]