Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 06:58:01 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] USLB "Robert Gammon"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD "Winston Little"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Try a FREE site at http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/reports/ Tell me what you think. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Calkins" <jcalkins@olypen.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD > I introduced myself on April 20th, 2002 and showed how I use IBD data for my > lists. (CANSLIM jc) > > I too have thought of stopping the paper then use a follow through week and > get a one month subscription to DGO. I would like to know how you find the > main concept of WON's elephants in the bathtub without WTBMF in IBD? This > list "is" IBD, period, if you turn off all the noise! As I indicated in my 4 > years of data entry of WTBMF, looking at their charts and selecting a > possible CWH, Double Bottom, or Flat Base and Stocks in the News data lists, > I find some 90% of the time a Mini Graph has shown up to give me the > fundamental data that I use to create my sorted lists....(see my "CANSLIM > jc" from April 20, 2002). > > As outlined in his books, tapes, videos, paper, seminars and online, all the > CANSLIM rules should be applied otherwise you are using some other style of > speculation that does not have the models developed my WON. > > My observations now are that IBD is not listing as many "NEAR NEW HIGHS" in > the Stocks in the News Mini Graphs, and are listing stocks that appear to be > extended from their consolidations by more than the %15 that they say they > don't show. So I too am a little confused at times by their > inconsistencies, but maybe with the market we may be seeing some short > candidates and or maybe the CANSLIM CWH's are just not there, yet. It would > be great to talk to the people who choose which of the New Highs get chosen > for the Stocks in the News. > > Has anyone ever found the elephants anywhere else? > > JC > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian" <ianstm@shaw.ca> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:16 PM > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD > > > > I'll chip in with a more optimistic view of IBD: > > > > All I ever read is the 'earnings', 'WTBMF' and 'new highs' sections, and I > > come away with a great appreciation for the paper. I am a big, big fan of > > their earnings section - it is thorough, comprehensive and has enough data > > to do some serious mining. They charge me $2.50/day for it here, which is > > the best money I spend on investing tools, by a country mile. > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Bill Triffet <btriffet@earthlink.net> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:18 PM > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD > > > > > > > I just got done explaining to one of the members offline that the > Weekend > > > Review was a good place to start. Back in 97-99 they had more with > actual > > > bases ready to go. I found some great winners there back then (oh the > good > > > ol days). Perhaps it's out lived it's usefulness. I have noticed this > year > > a > > > lot more extended stocks than not are put there. I just think it's a > sign > > > of the market but they must still fill the paper with somthing... > > > > > > On a related note, I'm about to switch from IBD to Daily Graphs for the > > > reasons above. While the subcription is a lot more, it's usefulness more > > > than justifies it. I got REAL tired of reading about how Clinton was the > > > anti-Christ with no real stock picks to show for it all. > > > > > > -Bill > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "J. Lobatto" <jlobatto@nyc.rr.com> > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:19 PM > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > > I'll second these thoughts. It always puzzles me why in The Weekend > > Review > > > > section they display graphs of stocks that are overextended. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net> > > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:04 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > > > > > what, we gotta think for ourselves now as well? Actually, I agree, > at > > > > least > > > > > in part. I just hate IBD always pretending that they know it all, by > > > using > > > > > charts already weeks or months, or years, old. > > > > > > > > > > I stopped subscribing years ago because, in part, they were not > > teaching > > > > me > > > > > anything new about handling "TODAY'S" market. I can figure out, > today, > > > > real > > > > > well what I should have done three months ago (and most likely did > not > > > do > > > > > then). That's easy, try something challenging, like staying fully > > > invested > > > > > in today's market place. And making money at the same time. > > > > > > > > > > Tom Worley > > > > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > > > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Ian" <ianstm@shaw.ca> > > > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:20 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dunno. I think that would take away some of our advantage. > > > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net> > > > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:26 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IBD has a history of featuring stocks long after they are buyable, > > and > > > > > > already a proven winner. We have had many discussions here about > > that, > > > > and > > > > > I > > > > > > suspect most members, as well as most paying subscribers, would > like > > > > them > > > > > to > > > > > > feature more on current situations. Show the stocks with good c&h > > > > > formations > > > > > > right now that have fundies (fundamentals) that make them worth > > > watching > > > > > > closely. > > > > > > > > > > > > Point out stocks that are ridiculously overextended, or have no > > > fundies > > > > at > > > > > > all, as possible shorts > > > > > > > > > > > > Point out distribution days as they occur, both on indexes and > > > > individual > > > > > > stocks > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom Worley > > > > > > stkguru@bellsouth.net > > > > > > AIM: TexWorley > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com> > > > > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:18 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] SAH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom: > > > > > > > > > > > > My thinking had been that I was the only one wondering about the > > > > companies > > > > > > selected and somtimes repeated in feature stories a week or two > > later > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > paper. > > > > > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] USLB "Robert Gammon"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] SAH - now IBD "Winston Little"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]