Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX

From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX
Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 22:57:51 EDT

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] IBD website question? Steve F
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] IBD website question? Spencer48@aol.com
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Matt & Alicia Leverette"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Tom:

     Why would a company have so many share outstanding with such a 
relatively small float?  DG doesn't show any stock buybacks.  The only thing 
I can think of is that the company executives want to be able to offer stock 
options to its employees-and without having to hold a vote on issuing new 
shares.  

     Does that make sense to you, or would another scenario make more sense?

jans


In a message dated 5/4/2002 6:09:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:

<< Biggest concern I would have is that most of the issue is held by 
outsiders (issue 108.4 million shares, management owns 2%, but only 10.8 
million shares left in the float according to DGO).
 
 fundies look good, however cash flow (29 cents) barely exceeds last year's 
earnings of 24 cents, despite some impressive earnings numbers.
 
 sales appear to be growing nicely, but earnings are not
 
 Tom Worley >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.