Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 02:35:24 -0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Matt & Alicia Leverette"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_018F_01C1F3DD.82698540
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
thanks, Katherine, should have read your email before replying. =
Obviously I don't follow this company or have done any due diligence on =
it.
Tom Worley
stkguru@bellsouth.net
AIM: TexWorley
- ----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX
Hi jans,
Apologies to Tom for answering...but most of the outstanding shares are =
still owned by APOL, the parent.
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Spencer48@aol.com=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX
Tom:
Why would a company have so many share outstanding with such a=20
relatively small float? DG doesn't show any stock buybacks. The only =
thing=20
I can think of is that the company executives want to be able to offer =
stock=20
options to its employees-and without having to hold a vote on issuing =
new=20
shares. =20
Does that make sense to you, or would another scenario make more =
sense?
jans
In a message dated 5/4/2002 6:09:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time,=20
stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:
<< Biggest concern I would have is that most of the issue is held by=20
outsiders (issue 108.4 million shares, management owns 2%, but only =
10.8=20
million shares left in the float according to DGO).
=20
fundies look good, however cash flow (29 cents) barely exceeds last =
year's=20
earnings of 24 cents, despite some impressive earnings numbers.
=20
sales appear to be growing nicely, but earnings are not
=20
Tom Worley >>
-
-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_000_018F_01C1F3DD.82698540
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>thanks, Katherine, should have read your email =
before=20
replying. Obviously I don't follow this company or have done any due =
diligence=20
on it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Tom Worley<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A><BR>AIM:=20
TexWorley</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine Malm</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, May 04, 2002 11:10 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Hi jans,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Apologies to Tom for answering...but most of the outstanding shares =
are=20
still owned by APOL, the parent.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3DSpencer48@aol.com=20
href=3D"mailto:Spencer48@aol.com">Spencer48@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, May 04, 2002 =
9:57=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] =
UOPX</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Tom:<BR><BR> Why would a =
company have=20
so many share outstanding with such a <BR>relatively small =
float? DG=20
doesn't show any stock buybacks. The only thing <BR>I can think =
of is=20
that the company executives want to be able to offer stock <BR>options =
to its=20
employees-and without having to hold a vote on issuing new =
<BR>shares. =20
<BR><BR> Does that make sense to you, or would =
another=20
scenario make more sense?<BR><BR>jans<BR><BR><BR>In a message dated =
5/4/2002=20
6:09:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, <BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">stkguru@bellsouth.net</A>=20
writes:<BR><BR><< Biggest concern I would have is that most of =
the issue=20
is held by <BR>outsiders (issue 108.4 million shares, management owns =
2%, but=20
only 10.8 <BR>million shares left in the float according to=20
DGO).<BR> <BR> fundies look good, however cash flow (29 =
cents)=20
barely exceeds last year's <BR>earnings of 24 cents, despite some =
impressive=20
earnings numbers.<BR> <BR> sales appear to be growing =
nicely, but=20
earnings are not<BR> <BR> Tom Worley =
>><BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20
subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
the=20
email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim". Do=20
not use quotes in your email.</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_018F_01C1F3DD.82698540--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Matt & Alicia Leverette"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]